100-Day Review of Brisbane Olympics Plan and Infrastructure

[AustralianFan]

30 minutes ago, AustralianFan said:

The following Victoria Park Strategic Plan Discussion Paper by Arcadis and now being reported widely in the media been sent to the 100-day Review of the Brisbane Olympic Plan and Infrastructure.

 

• Arcadis-Victoria-Park-Strategic-Plan_Final_reduced.pdf
  13.7 MBViews: 14

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Proposal

• A new 60,000+ seat oval stadium is the centrepiece of the Brisbane Bold 2032 concept put forward by the Architectural, Landscape and Urban Design company, Archipelago.
• A productive use of sports and recreation zoned land that was formerly Victoria Park Golf Course, the site is ideally positioned to leverage further benefits from existing mass transit investments in Brisbane Metro and Cross River Rail.
• The Brisbane Bold 2032 concept responds to the driver of the impending Brisbane 2032 Games as an opportunity to create legacy infrastructure for the State.
• It envisages a sporting precinct that is also able to accommodate a multi-purpose indoor arena and a new National Swimming Stadium.
• However, we argue that irrespective of the Olympics, SEQ needs a new oval stadium, suitable for Cricket, AFL and concerts and that this can be developed in a commercially sustainable way with strong private sector involvement.

 

The biggest question I have, and is a core part of the Review’s Terms of Reference, is if this Olympic Park style of venues in Victoria Park can be done within the existing funding envelope? 

Also, why move Brisbane Arena from Roma Street Parklands and take up extra green parkland space at Victoria Park?

Might have to be a very hefty private sector $$ contribution for this whole plan to grow legs.

[AustralianFan]

ARCADIS FAILS TO MENTION THE TWO OTHER OLYMPIC COMPETITIONS IT IS EVICTING FROM VICTORIA PARK

Yes, they missed them both. Not a word, not a mention in this discussion paper of these two sports already approved and listed for Victoria Park on the official Brisbane 2032 Olympic website.

These are:

Olympic Cross Country Equestrian	Victoria Park
Olympic BMX Freestyle	Victoria Park

Seriously, were Arcadis rushing to get this glossy discussion paper out after the election and is that why they completely overlooked what happens to these two Olympic/Paralympic competitions already approved for Victoria Park?

So have Arcadis been living under a rock all this time? Did some glossy designer at Arcadis in their rush after the election think Victoria Park was a clean slate for them to freewheel their designs without a care in the world?

No, Victoria Park is not a clean slate.

Do it properly and thoroughly.

Arcadis should have at the very least mentioned something like:
”there is no room in Victoria Park to also host the Olympic Cross Country Equestrian and BMX Freestyle competitions and alternative locations for these will need to be sourced by BOCOG.”

But no, that didn’t do that …. just kicked two Olympic sports out of Victoria Park without a single word about it.

That makes Aracadis looks both naive and incompetent.

[Gonzo]

I can't keep up anymore 

Quote

Brisbane’s powerful 2032 Olympic Games boss Andrew Liveris says a new stadium should be built at Victoria Park.

https://www.couriermail.com.au/news/queensland/qld-politics/olympics-supremo-andrew-liveris-makes-stunning-call-for-new-victoria-park-stadium/news-story/6a872dfb8d297d1d905585301bf176e4

[Rob2012]

 

[Gonzo]

Paywall cracked version

https://archive.md/ml0uO

https://archive.md/oLmyv

[AustralianFan]

Public submissions to the 100-day Review of the Brisbane Olympic and Infrastructure Plan to start soon:

One Week Later

Confusion over Olympic review processes to end ‘imminently’

The independent review of Brisbane 2032 Olympic infrastructure will “imminently” open its doors to public submissions, ending weeks of uncertainty for venue opponents and proponents alike.

A Games Independent Infrastructure and Co-ordination Authority spokesman confirmed there would shortly be clarity about how stakeholders and residents could have their voices heard.

Not shortly enough for Save Victoria Park spokeswoman Sue Bremner, who said she would have expected processes to already be in place when the GIICA board was announced so it could hit the ground running.

“It’s been a week since the premier announced the terms of reference for the 100-day review and, even given that there is set-up time, one would imagine that they would have had in train what the process is going to be,” she said.

“For any groups, but certainly for a voluntary community organisation such as ourselves, we need to know as soon as possible what the format is, whether it’s going to involve interviews, as the Quirk report did, whether there’s a page limit.

“What are going to be the requirements? And most of all, seeing as we’re going over Christmas/New Year very soon, what’s the end submission date?

“If they can get that out ASAP, it will, it will enrich the quality of the submissions that they get because it gives people appropriate lead time.”

Those in favour of a Victoria Park stadium were also at a loss. Arcadis Brisbane Games and legacy lead Paul Allan, who contributed to the Quirk review earlier in February, said he was eager to spruik Victoria Park’s merits to the panel.

“The terms of reference are there, but I’m not sure how they’re going to [proceed],” he said.

Arcadis has prepared a discussion paper on Victoria Park, outlining a strategic case for a sports precinct on the site. Allan said he planned to “feed it into the review”.

“If it’s a formal process, that that’s the probable path we’ll follow,” he said.

The proposed Victoria Park stadium is one of the more contentious proposals.CREDIT: ARCHIPELAGO

“If it’s an informal process, I probably still plan on submitting this to try and, again, help with their assessment of all the different venues.”

Other interest groups were similarly frustrated. Fair Funding for Football co-founder Chris McCoy said the group had been waiting to make a submission to the review since October’s election.

“The Olympics gives Queensland and football a real opportunity to leave an Olympic legacy for an Olympic sport through an upgraded, fit-for-purpose stadium at Perry Park,” he said.

“We’ve been wanting to stress to the review just how important a Perry Park legacy is for the state and the sport, but so far we’ve been unable to find a way to lodge our submission.”

A GIICA spokesman said the 100-day review would consider public submissions, targeted consultation and relevant advice from stakeholders and experts.

“The public consultation period of the review will open imminently, allowing individual Queenslanders and organisations to provide their views and ideas. Further details will be available soon,” he said.

The spokesman said the new GIICA board had a busy first week analysing and reviewing Games infrastructure, planning and legacy projects.

“Having held its first formal meeting this week, the board will be extremely busy in the lead-up to Christmas, as they continue with targeted engagement, and will be meeting again on Monday as part of a regular series scheduled over the coming weeks,” he said.

“Hosting the Games is a privilege that will define Brisbane and Queensland for decades to come and the work being undertaken in the Review will help achieve this vision: to ensure the right infrastructure is built in the right place.”

Credit:  Brisbane Times

[Tejas57]

if anything is built at Victoria Park it should be the stadium only

 

there's no need for a national aquatic center with chandler, and Brisbane Live should stay at roma st - if only for crowd control when multiple events are on. Also Roma St has a bigger capacity than what's being proposed here. 

 

also, we know people are going to jump up and down and carry on about the loss of green space at victoria park and a stadium - the main thing that needs building, is alot more palatable than a stadium, an aquatic centre and a concert venue

[AustralianFan]

4 hours ago, Tejas57 said:

if anything is built at Victoria Park it should be the stadium only

 

there's no need for a national aquatic center with chandler, and Brisbane Live should stay at roma st - if only for crowd control when multiple events are on. Also Roma St has a bigger capacity than what's being proposed here. 

 

also, we know people are going to jump up and down and carry on about the loss of green space at victoria park and a stadium - the main thing that needs building, is alot more palatable than a stadium, an aquatic centre and a concert venue

100%

[AustralianFan]

So Cricket Australia has come out to bat for a new legacy Stadium for Cricket, AFL and the Olympic Track and Field in the 100-day Review.

So,   AFL.   …….. where are you?

*************************

From the Courier Mail

Cricket Australia launches bid to axe Gabba for ‘50-year’ venue

Cricket Australia has launched a major push to have the Gabba scrapped as a Test venue and replaced by a stadium which could sustain the sport “for 50 years.’’

Cricket Australia boss Nick Hockley has confirmed to this masthead the grand dream is to play the final cricket match of the 2032 Olympics at the Gabba then move to a proposed new venue at Victoria Park.
In conjunction with the AFL’s Brisbane Lions, who are also based at the Gabba, cricket will send this far-reaching proposal to the Queensland government’s 100-day Olympic venue review.

“The Gabba has played a pivotal role in Queensland cricket history and we’re delighted by the strong ticket sales for this Test,’’ Hockley said of Saturday’s Australia-India clash. 
“That said, it’s clear the Gabba is coming to the end of its useful life and the Brisbane 2032 Games presents a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to develop a world class stadium that delivers strong legacy benefits for Queensland, by providing cricket and football fans with the facilities that they deserve.

 

“Hopefully, this latest review will provide the certainty that everyone is craving, not least the Games organisers and together with Queensland Cricket, the AFL and the Lions, we will be making a strong case for a new stadium that can accommodate cricket and Australian rules football at Victoria Park into the future.

“It would be amazing to host the Olympic cricket finals at the Gabba and then move straight into a brilliant new stadium where fans can enjoy international and domestic cricket in comfort for the next 50 years or more. 
“This would also avoid disruption and costs to fans and the sports from any displacement from the Gabba between now and the Games.’’

The ageing, fading Gabba has hosted 66 Tests since the first against South Africa in 1931 but is now ranked the number five Test venue in Australia behind the iconic Sydney and Melbourne cricket grounds, the grandly redeveloped Adelaide Oval and recently constructed Optus Oval in Perth.

The Gabba will host an Ashes Test next year but, for the first time in 50 years, will not host a Test in 2026-27 as a result of uncertainly over Brisbane’s Olympic plans which Hockley conceded had made it difficult for cricket officials.
“The lack of clarity about elements of the Olympic and Paralympic Games infrastructure has certainly caused a level frustration and uncertainty for sports played at the Gabba. 

“Queensland is an enormously important market for cricket, so it was unfortunate we could only plan for the next two years of international cricket in Brisbane in our seven-year international schedule.”

The Lions, who sell out most of their Gabba games and whose popularity will surge further on the back on this year’s AFL premiership win, support the move to the proposed new stadium which could seat 60,000 compared to the Gabba’s 37,000.
The Victoria Park proposal has become a fan favourite but is yet to gain key political support with the former Labor government initially favouring redeveloping the Gabba before endorsing a move to have the Olympic athletics at QSAC Stadium in Nathan.

 

[yoshi]

Cricket coming out in favour of Victoria Park should be a very big moment - a lot of the argument for the Gabba was to retain its cricket tradition wasn't it. I don't see why the AFL don't want to endorse it, especially if they've just won the title. Talk about a once in a lifetime opportunity to get a better stadium built & not be the ones responsible for it!

[AustralianFan]

10 minutes ago, yoshi said:

Cricket coming out in favour of Victoria Park should be a very big moment - a lot of the argument for the Gabba was to retain its cricket tradition wasn't it. I don't see why the AFL don't want to endorse it, especially if they've just won the title. Talk about a once in a lifetime opportunity to get a better stadium built & not be the ones responsible for it!

Absolutely 😀

[Gonzo]

Brisbane Lions endorsed the Victoria Park model months ago

[AustralianFan]

1 hour ago, Gonzo said:

Brisbane Lions endorsed the Victoria Park model months ago

That’s true.  Was thinking of the AFL itself as the sport’s governing body.  Like Cricket Australia just did for cricket at a Victoria Park Stadium.

[AustralianFan]

Submissions from Individuals

Individuals are also invited to provide submissions for consideration in the 100-Day Review.

So any of us here in on Gamesbids.com can send submissions to the Review through the portal below.

Click here to view the full Terms of Reference for the 100 Day Review.

Public consultation is open from Tuesday 10 December 2024 to Friday 10 January 2025.
After this, all submissions will be assessed to inform the final report to be handed down in March. 

Click here to read the 100 Day Review Public Consultation Frequently Asked Questions.


SUBMISSIONS PORTAL

Click Here to actually participate in the 100 Day Review.

Source: Q2032 Get Involved

[Tejas57]

i have submitted the below:

 

Submission to the 100-Day Olympic Games Review: Proposal for Victoria Park as the Site for the Main Olympic Stadium

I am submitting this proposal as an engaged and passionate Queenslander with a deep interest in the Olympic Games and a desire to see the 2032 Brisbane Olympics present the best possible representation of our city to the global stage. While I do not possess professional expertise in town planning or event management, my fervent support for the Games and my extensive experience as an Olympic fan guide my recommendations for the development of Brisbane’s infrastructure in anticipation of the event.

After careful consideration, I firmly believe that the most appropriate site for the main Olympic stadium is Victoria Park, rather than the currently proposed location at Woolloongabba. While I understand that this suggestion would involve the loss of some greenspace and the relocation of specific Olympic events, such as mountain biking and equestrian, I am confident that the long-term benefits of establishing a new stadium at Victoria Park far outweigh these challenges.

Potential Challenges of Constructing a New Stadium at Victoria Park

1. Loss of Greenspace: One of the key disadvantages is the reduction of greenspace at Victoria Park, an important public area.
2. Increased Traffic Congestion: The addition of a major stadium may exacerbate traffic flows in the surrounding areas, particularly near the Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital.
3. Noise Pollution: The increased frequency of events at the stadium may contribute to noise, which could affect the surrounding residential areas.
4. Accessibility Concerns: The location of the stadium may require attendees to walk long distances to reach available public transport, particularly for those relying on alternative forms of transportation.
5. Relocation of Events: The relocation of mountain biking and equestrian events to other venues would necessitate the identification and development of alternative sites.

Despite these potential drawbacks, the benefits of constructing a new stadium at Victoria Park present a compelling case.

Benefits of Constructing a New Stadium at Victoria Park

1. Accommodation for Major Sporting Events: The establishment of a new stadium at Victoria Park would facilitate the seamless transfer of sporting events such as cricket and AFL from the Gabba, ensuring continuity of these major events in the region post-2032.
2. Post-2032 Urban Development: The demolition of the Gabba after the 2032 Games (if used as part of an Olympic 2032 T20 cricket tournament) could provide valuable space for other essential community facilities, such as the expansion of the East Brisbane State School.
3. Reduction in Traffic Disruptions: Rebuilding the Gabba would require the closure of major thoroughfares such as Stanley and Vulture Streets, which would likely result in traffic disruptions for an extended period. Victoria Park, by contrast, offers a more advantageous location for avoiding these long-term disruptions.
4. Enhanced Stadium Capacity: A new stadium at Victoria Park could accommodate between 60,000 and 70,000 spectators—significantly more than the Woolloongabba site, which is constrained by surrounding infrastructure such as major roads and schools.
5. Improved Security Management: With fewer surrounding buildings, the Victoria Park site would be easier to secure for the Games and for the international dignitaries attending, ensuring better overall safety and protection.
6. Flexibility for Additional Events: The parkland surrounding Victoria Park would provide ample space for hosting additional events and activities beyond the Olympic Games, including concerts, with fewer restrictions compared to the Woolloongabba site.
7. Streamlined Logistics: The extensive parkland around Victoria Park would facilitate efficient event logistics, including security screening, food and merchandise vendors, and broadcasting services, all of which are essential for the smooth operation of large-scale events.
8. Proximity to the City: Victoria Park’s central location, within walking distance from the Brisbane CBD, ensures ease of access for both local residents and international visitors, contributing to a positive experience for all attendees.

My personal experience attending large-scale events at Optus Stadium in Perth further supports the benefits of a well-designed stadium complex. In February 2024, I attended the WWE Elimination Chamber event, which hosted over 52,000 spectators, followed by an AFL match between the West Coast Eagles and Hawthorn, which drew nearly 49,500 attendees in June 2024. At both events, I experienced minimal delays in entry, efficient crowd movement, and quick access to public transport, including an onsite train station that facilitated easy travel back to the Perth CBD.

In contrast, attending the Brisbane Lions vs. Carlton match at Woolloongabba on September 7, 2024, with a sellout crowd of 35,660, presented several challenges. Although the transport issues would be solved by upcoming improvements from the Cross River Rail project, the journey to the venue involved significant delays due to heavy traffic, particularly along the Riverside Expressway. Once I arrived at the venue, I had to navigate crowded streets and limited entry points, leading to delays in entering the stadium. The narrow concourses and long queues for food and bathroom facilities also made for a less-than-ideal experience.

Considering the Long-Term Legacy of the Games

In evaluating the proposed locations for the main Olympic stadium, it is essential to consider the long-term legacy that will be left after the IOC departs. Sydney’s 2000 Olympics, widely regarded as one of the best in history, transformed a derelict industrial area at Homebush into a thriving sports and entertainment precinct that remains in use to this day. This enduring legacy is a model for what Brisbane should aspire to achieve, ensuring that the Olympic Games leave behind positive, lasting impacts on the city and its residents.

Given the anticipated growth of Brisbane’s population, it is essential that the main stadium accommodate at least 60,000 spectators to ensure that as many Queenslanders as possible can experience this once-in-a-lifetime event in person. The Woolloongabba site, constrained by surrounding infrastructure, is unlikely to provide sufficient space for a stadium of this size, nor for the necessary supporting infrastructure, including security screening areas, media facilities, and general public spaces.

Concerns Regarding the Brisbane Live Venue and Aquatics Centre Proposal

I have reviewed the proposal by Arcadis for the development of the Brisbane Live Venue and an upgraded Aquatics Centre in Victoria Park, and I strongly oppose this approach. The concentration of multiple venues in one area could place undue pressure on local transport infrastructure, particularly if several events conclude simultaneously, potentially resulting in the movement of up to 90,000 people at once. Furthermore, while I support the idea of a national aquatics centre, I believe that this facility would be better suited to a location such as the Chandler Aquatic Centre, rather than contributing to the further loss of parkland at Victoria Park.

Additionally, I believe that the proposed site for the Brisbane Arena should remain at Roma Street, which is well-served by existing transport infrastructure and represents an underutilized space with great potential. Focusing on the construction of a single stadium at Victoria Park would allow for the preservation of greenspace and would present fewer political and logistical challenges compared to developing multiple venues in the area.

Conclusion

In conclusion, I strongly urge the 100-Day Olympic Games Review team to recommend the construction of a new stadium at Victoria Park. The benefits of this location—including increased capacity, better logistical support, improved security, and long-term urban development opportunities—far outweigh the drawbacks. By prioritizing the creation of a world-class venue that can accommodate the growing needs of Brisbane, the 2032 Olympic Games will leave a lasting legacy for future generations of Queenslanders.

[AustralianFan]

6 hours ago, Tejas57 said:

i have submitted the below:

 

Submission to the 100-Day Olympic Games Review: Proposal for Victoria Park as the Site for the Main Olympic Stadium

I am submitting this proposal as an engaged and passionate Queenslander with a deep interest in the Olympic Games and a desire to see the 2032 Brisbane Olympics present the best possible representation of our city to the global stage. While I do not possess professional expertise in town planning or event management, my fervent support for the Games and my extensive experience as an Olympic fan guide my recommendations for the development of Brisbane’s infrastructure in anticipation of the event.

After careful consideration, I firmly believe that the most appropriate site for the main Olympic stadium is Victoria Park, rather than the currently proposed location at Woolloongabba. While I understand that this suggestion would involve the loss of some greenspace and the relocation of specific Olympic events, such as mountain biking and equestrian, I am confident that the long-term benefits of establishing a new stadium at Victoria Park far outweigh these challenges.

Potential Challenges of Constructing a New Stadium at Victoria Park

1. Loss of Greenspace: One of the key disadvantages is the reduction of greenspace at Victoria Park, an important public area.
2. Increased Traffic Congestion: The addition of a major stadium may exacerbate traffic flows in the surrounding areas, particularly near the Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital.
3. Noise Pollution: The increased frequency of events at the stadium may contribute to noise, which could affect the surrounding residential areas.
4. Accessibility Concerns: The location of the stadium may require attendees to walk long distances to reach available public transport, particularly for those relying on alternative forms of transportation.
5. Relocation of Events: The relocation of mountain biking and equestrian events to other venues would necessitate the identification and development of alternative sites.

Despite these potential drawbacks, the benefits of constructing a new stadium at Victoria Park present a compelling case.

Benefits of Constructing a New Stadium at Victoria Park

1. Accommodation for Major Sporting Events: The establishment of a new stadium at Victoria Park would facilitate the seamless transfer of sporting events such as cricket and AFL from the Gabba, ensuring continuity of these major events in the region post-2032.
2. Post-2032 Urban Development: The demolition of the Gabba after the 2032 Games (if used as part of an Olympic 2032 T20 cricket tournament) could provide valuable space for other essential community facilities, such as the expansion of the East Brisbane State School.
3. Reduction in Traffic Disruptions: Rebuilding the Gabba would require the closure of major thoroughfares such as Stanley and Vulture Streets, which would likely result in traffic disruptions for an extended period. Victoria Park, by contrast, offers a more advantageous location for avoiding these long-term disruptions.
4. Enhanced Stadium Capacity: A new stadium at Victoria Park could accommodate between 60,000 and 70,000 spectators—significantly more than the Woolloongabba site, which is constrained by surrounding infrastructure such as major roads and schools.
5. Improved Security Management: With fewer surrounding buildings, the Victoria Park site would be easier to secure for the Games and for the international dignitaries attending, ensuring better overall safety and protection.
6. Flexibility for Additional Events: The parkland surrounding Victoria Park would provide ample space for hosting additional events and activities beyond the Olympic Games, including concerts, with fewer restrictions compared to the Woolloongabba site.
7. Streamlined Logistics: The extensive parkland around Victoria Park would facilitate efficient event logistics, including security screening, food and merchandise vendors, and broadcasting services, all of which are essential for the smooth operation of large-scale events.
8. Proximity to the City: Victoria Park’s central location, within walking distance from the Brisbane CBD, ensures ease of access for both local residents and international visitors, contributing to a positive experience for all attendees.

My personal experience attending large-scale events at Optus Stadium in Perth further supports the benefits of a well-designed stadium complex. In February 2024, I attended the WWE Elimination Chamber event, which hosted over 52,000 spectators, followed by an AFL match between the West Coast Eagles and Hawthorn, which drew nearly 49,500 attendees in June 2024. At both events, I experienced minimal delays in entry, efficient crowd movement, and quick access to public transport, including an onsite train station that facilitated easy travel back to the Perth CBD.

In contrast, attending the Brisbane Lions vs. Carlton match at Woolloongabba on September 7, 2024, with a sellout crowd of 35,660, presented several challenges. Although the transport issues would be solved by upcoming improvements from the Cross River Rail project, the journey to the venue involved significant delays due to heavy traffic, particularly along the Riverside Expressway. Once I arrived at the venue, I had to navigate crowded streets and limited entry points, leading to delays in entering the stadium. The narrow concourses and long queues for food and bathroom facilities also made for a less-than-ideal experience.

Considering the Long-Term Legacy of the Games

In evaluating the proposed locations for the main Olympic stadium, it is essential to consider the long-term legacy that will be left after the IOC departs. Sydney’s 2000 Olympics, widely regarded as one of the best in history, transformed a derelict industrial area at Homebush into a thriving sports and entertainment precinct that remains in use to this day. This enduring legacy is a model for what Brisbane should aspire to achieve, ensuring that the Olympic Games leave behind positive, lasting impacts on the city and its residents.

Given the anticipated growth of Brisbane’s population, it is essential that the main stadium accommodate at least 60,000 spectators to ensure that as many Queenslanders as possible can experience this once-in-a-lifetime event in person. The Woolloongabba site, constrained by surrounding infrastructure, is unlikely to provide sufficient space for a stadium of this size, nor for the necessary supporting infrastructure, including security screening areas, media facilities, and general public spaces.

Concerns Regarding the Brisbane Live Venue and Aquatics Centre Proposal

I have reviewed the proposal by Arcadis for the development of the Brisbane Live Venue and an upgraded Aquatics Centre in Victoria Park, and I strongly oppose this approach. The concentration of multiple venues in one area could place undue pressure on local transport infrastructure, particularly if several events conclude simultaneously, potentially resulting in the movement of up to 90,000 people at once. Furthermore, while I support the idea of a national aquatics centre, I believe that this facility would be better suited to a location such as the Chandler Aquatic Centre, rather than contributing to the further loss of parkland at Victoria Park.

Additionally, I believe that the proposed site for the Brisbane Arena should remain at Roma Street, which is well-served by existing transport infrastructure and represents an underutilized space with great potential. Focusing on the construction of a single stadium at Victoria Park would allow for the preservation of greenspace and would present fewer political and logistical challenges compared to developing multiple venues in the area.

Conclusion

In conclusion, I strongly urge the 100-Day Olympic Games Review team to recommend the construction of a new stadium at Victoria Park. The benefits of this location—including increased capacity, better logistical support, improved security, and long-term urban development opportunities—far outweigh the drawbacks. By prioritizing the creation of a world-class venue that can accommodate the growing needs of Brisbane, the 2032 Olympic Games will leave a lasting legacy for future generations of Queenslanders.

Excellent submission @Tejas57.

Well planned, argued and presented.

[AustralianFan]

Also being fed into the 100-day Review is this HAL Architects plan for:

• Brisbane Arena to be built in vacant pand adjacent to the new Woolangabba Train Station box, and
• demolition pf the Gabba and a new 55,000 stadium on it’s place.

The HAL Architects plan can be viewed via the link below:

 

[AustralianFan]

Suggest that if you’re passionate about an idea for Brisbane 2032’s stadiums, venues, infrastructure that you put a submission to the 100-day Review by the 10 January 2025 deadline.  Not long to go.

Click here >> SUBMISSIONS PORTAL: 100-Day Review - Get Involved

[AustralianFan]

So what we know from media reports, at least some of the following plans *may have been submitted to the 100-Day Review as venue options for TRACK & FIELD and as an AFL & CRICKET Legacy Stadium leading up to the Brisbane 2032 Olympic and Paralympic Games and beyond.

*ALBION  Original Brisbane 2032 Bid - report by Ausstadiums.com << click on the link

 

GABBA OLYMPIC PARK  HAL Architects  << click on the link

 

*ORIGINAL GABBA REBUILD  Project Validation Report - Qld Govt - POPULOUS Architects

 

GABBA WEST STADIUM  KIRK Architects << click on the link

 

NORTHSHORE HAMILTON  Design Alliance  << click on the link

 

*QSAC - Queensland Sports & Athletics Centre  Ministerial Statement - 18 Mar 24  << click on the link

 

VICTORIA PARK - OLYMPIC PARK  ARCADIS Architects  << click on the link

 

VICTORIA PARK STADIUM  QUIRK Sport Venue Review  << click on the link

[AustralianFan]

4 hours ago, AustralianFan said:

So what we know from media reports, at least some of the following plans *may have been submitted to the 100-Day Review as venue options for TRACK & FIELD and as an AFL & CRICKET Legacy Stadium leading up to the Brisbane 2032 Olympic and Paralympic Games and beyond.

*ALBION  Original Brisbane 2032 Bid - report by Ausstadiums.com << click on the link

 

GABBA OLYMPIC PARK  HAL Architects  << click on the link

 

*ORIGINAL GABBA REBUILD  Project Validation Report - Qld Govt - POPULOUS Architects

 

GABBA WEST STADIUM  KIRK Architects << click on the link

 

NORTHSHORE HAMILTON  Design Alliance  << click on the link

 

*QSAC - Queensland Sports & Athletics Centre  Ministerial Statement - 18 Mar 24  << click on the link

 

VICTORIA PARK - OLYMPIC PARK  ARCADIS Architects  << click on the link

 

VICTORIA PARK STADIUM  QUIRK Sport Venue Review  << click on the link

Any stadium options missed out on the above list ?
There’s been quite a few designs coming out over the past months it’s hard to keep up with what’s going to the Review to consider.
I’ve got a feeling I’ve missed some.

[AustralianFan]

Late Gold Coast bid to beat Toowoomba in hosting equestrian events 

Submissions to the Review are coming thick and fast with only 14 days to go until the deadline on 10January.

So now we have Toomwoomba long interested in hosting equestrian events but now under threat from the Gold Coast’s late  audacious submission to the Review to host Equestrian events themselves.  See Gold Coast Bulletin report further below.

I support Toowoomba getting equestrian but am concerned about the extra cost $$ of an athletes village in Toowoomba.  If somehow the money can be found to have both the equestrian events and a satellite athletes village, that’s great, given Toowoomba is too far from the Brisbane athletes village for daily commutes by athletes.

The extra cost of an additional satellite athletes village really counted against Toowoomba and one of the reasons why this beautiful city was taken out of Brisbane 2032’s original bid plans.
However, in favour of the Gold Coast’s bid to host equestrian is that they already have an athletes village in the master plan.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

“Nobody else can do it’:  Why Gold Coast should host 2032 equestrian”

The Gold Coast Turf Club is making an audacious pitch to beat Toowoomba to the hosting rights for equestrian events at the 2032 Olympics. FIND OUT WHY

Let's run through the options on the table for the 2032 Brisbane Olympics, including the latest offering, a second Gabba stadium right next door.
The Gold Coast Turf Club is making an audacious pitch to beat Toowoomba to the hosting rights for equestrian events at the 2032 Olympics.
Club bosses are developing a Games masterplan which would see its Bundall complex become the host for showjumping and dressage events, while the Aquis Park Elysian fields Equestrian Centre at Canungra would be used for eventing, training and quarantine.
It will be presented to the Games Infrastructure and Coordination Authority and state government in early 2025.
Turf Club CEO Steve Lines said the Gold Coast was the “perfect location” for the events.
“We believe there are no other venues in Queensland that can economically and effectively provide world-class venues which will also showcase the incredible tourism assets of the Gold Coast and its hinterland,” he said.

“The showjumping and dressage events under the new incredible Gold Coast Turf Club lights would provide worldwide exposure of the magnificent Surfers Paradise and Broadbeach skyline as a backdrop while the beautiful Gold Coast hinterland would be showcased through the eventing at Aquis Farm.”
Mr Lines said the proposal had “already received substantial stakeholder support” and he expected “further endorsements in the coming weeks”.
The equestrian events are currently earmarked for Brisbane but, like all other aspects of the Games, are part of the new state government’s 100-day review of the Olympics

The turf club is fresh off spending $73m to upgrade its facilities for night racing, including state-of-the-art lights, a new tunnel and an improved track.
Mr Lines said the Gold Coast’s proximity to Brisbane, plus the planned athletes village at Robina, made the city the logical choice.
“Imagine world-class equestrian events in superior locations and with the capacity for both those locations to provide supporting world-class entertainment events for the greater spectator event enjoyment,” he said.

“Put simply, no other proposal will be better for the athletes and spectators in addition to being the cheapest for taxpayers … and the cheapest by the length of the Gold Coast racecourse straight.”

It comes as Toowoomba is developing its own push to host the equestrian events.
State Treasurer David Janetzki, who is the MP for Toowoomba South, has backed the idea, which would see the planned Toowoomba Equestrian Centre become the Olympics’ horseflesh hub.
A submission is also being developed to be presented to the government.  “I support the reassessment of the Toowoomba Showgrounds,” he said earlier in December.

“We have a rare chance to align Olympic opportunity with the character of our region.  I will be submitting as a local MP to the 100-day Olympic infrastructure review supporting the RASQ’s (Royal Agricultural Society of Queensland) position.”
“I want Toowoomba to share in the Olympic legacy and will be working towards that goal.”

Credit:  Gold Coast Bulletin

[Brisbane Boy]

The submissions close next Friday at 11.59pm

Hopefully a few more ideas get a media release during the week or soon after.

The Authority have a lot of things to sort out before handing over the interim report to the LNP due Saturday 21st February 2025.

That's only 7 weeks or 34 workdays away.

Then the LNP will review the findings with the Authority and then officially it's handed to the Premier on around the 8th of March 2025.

Amazingly that will be close to one year after the Quirk review that was dated 18th March 2024

[Victorian]

On 1/5/2025 at 4:59 PM, Brisbane Boy said:

The submissions close next Friday at 11.59pm

Hopefully a few more ideas get a media release during the week or soon after.

The Authority have a lot of things to sort out before handing over the interim report to the LNP due Saturday 21st February 2025.

That's only 7 weeks or 34 workdays away.

Then the LNP will review the findings with the Authority and then officially it's handed to the Premier on around the 8th of March 2025.

Amazingly that will be close to one year after the Quirk review that was dated 18th March 2024

This is Toowoomba’s submission

https://www.smh.com.au/interactive/hub/media/tearout-excerpt/38315/DOCS-12075950-v2-TRC_Submission_-_GIICA_-_100_Day_Review-_Olympic_Venues_Redacted.pdf

[AustralianFan]

2 hours ago, Victorian said:

This is Toowoomba’s submission

https://www.smh.com.au/interactive/hub/media/tearout-excerpt/38315/DOCS-12075950-v2-TRC_Submission_-_GIICA_-_100_Day_Review-_Olympic_Venues_Redacted.pdf

Excellent find @Victorian

It’s interesting the Toowoomba submission has not once mentioned athletes accommodation for moving equestrian events there.

This is a clanger, given that their big rival for equestrian, Gold Coast, have an athletes village.

They missed suggesting use of the purpose-built Wellcamp Covid era accommodation. In fact, they did not make any mention of any type of Toowoomba athletes accommodation.

This omission implies that maybe they expect athlete and officials to commute daily from Brisbane (?). That’s not going to happen.

I guess the Review might sort it out but a glaring omission anyway.

[Brisbane Boy]

1 hour ago, AustralianFan said:

Excellent find @Victorian

It’s interesting the Toowoomba submission has not once mentioned athletes accommodation for moving equestrian events there.

This is a clanger, given that their big rival for equestrian, Gold Coast, have an athletes village.

They missed suggesting use of the purpose-built Wellcamp Covid era accommodation. In fact, they did not make any mention of any type of Toowoomba athletes accommodation.

This omission implies that maybe they expect athlete and officials to commute daily from Brisbane (?). That’s not going to happen.

I guess the Review might sort it out but a glaring omission anyway.

Yes, it is a bad omission. Wellcamp may or may not be suitable for athlete accommodation. I assume the IOC has minimum standards.

The Gold Coast submission will be interesting. Probably be a better spectacle but no legacy for the sport.

The GCCC probably throw more money into the project than Toowoomba can. Like they offered $75 million for swimming which would be a legacy facility.

As you say the GCCC have a village planned.

However, they would not have allowed for equestrian numbers. 

I want swimming moved to the GC but also pointed out the village has not been planned for that increased number.

At least all 3 sites have international standard airports to fly the horses in.

I read somewhere it costs $70-$80k to fly each horse and that is with the flight full mostly of horses.