Ansem Posted November 4, 2016 Report Posted November 4, 2016 I'd be shocked if Paris doesn't win. They are the perfect city to organize the games.
yoshi Posted November 4, 2016 Report Posted November 4, 2016 Paris, because those 100 years are the Olympic bidding process's greatest injustice.
FYI Posted November 4, 2016 Report Posted November 4, 2016 2 hours ago, Ansem said: I'd be shocked if Paris doesn't win. They are the perfect city to organize the games. I guess that you haven't yet visited the L.A. 24 thread then, huh. Though while I mostly agree with you here, lets just say that thread makes a certain World Cup thread around here as of late like child's play.
Ansem Posted November 5, 2016 Report Posted November 5, 2016 1 hour ago, FYI said: I guess that you haven't yet visited the L.A. 24 thread then, huh. Though while I mostly agree with you here, lets just say that thread makes a certain World Cup thread around here as of late like child's play. Nah...I'm not even going to start something there. Any opinions claiming that the USA can't win everything is methe with so much negativity it's not even funny anymore... But hey...someone will point out that LA already have all the infrastructure and that there's more people there and higher GDP....Bigger is better...doesn't matter the games were there in 84...America rules...etc... Nah... not interested
FYI Posted November 5, 2016 Report Posted November 5, 2016 Well, it's really not those points that you're generalizing on. But what I actually meant is that anyone can make a strong case based on what their preferential choice is. Since that particular L.A. supporter is just as tenacious as you are in the World Cup thread. And I brought it since you mentioned that Paris is the "perfect" city to organize the Games, which IDK, even in their case (in this day & age of the Olympics), such a city exists out there, not even L.A. (or Melbourne, or Toronto, etc), since 'perfect' can be subjective to many different people for many different things. And that especially holds true when it comes to the fastidious IOC members who come from all over the world. But does Paris have a big edge in this race? Absolutely they do. But it's not because they're perfect (per se), but because geopolitcal factors, along with technical merit, are tilting the scale their way.
neige Posted November 6, 2016 Report Posted November 6, 2016 On 05/11/2016 at 0:31 AM, yoshi said: Paris, because those 100 years are the Olympic bidding process's greatest injustice. Hey Yoshi, thanks for your support...but you forgot to vote!
zekekelso Posted November 8, 2016 Report Posted November 8, 2016 Jumping on team Budapest. Mostly to avoid choosing between the other two.
Sir Rols Posted November 8, 2016 Report Posted November 8, 2016 If they had a chance, I'd be for the Hungarians as wel.
bertieh16 Posted November 28, 2016 Report Posted November 28, 2016 Budapest, would be great for them in terms of inbound tourists, as well as this it would open up and put Hungary on the tourism map. If Paris won the bid, would people be potentially afraid to go there as a result of the terror attacks last year?
zekekelso Posted November 28, 2016 Report Posted November 28, 2016 1 hour ago, bertieh16 said: If Paris won the bid, would people be potentially afraid to go there as a result of the terror attacks last year? No
Roger87 Posted February 15, 2017 Report Posted February 15, 2017 On 28/11/2016 at 3:46 PM, bertieh16 said: Budapest, would be great for them in terms of inbound tourists, as well as this it would open up and put Hungary on the tourism map. If Paris won the bid, would people be potentially afraid to go there as a result of the terror attacks last year? Well, Los Angeles suffered a terror attack and Budapest recently. I mean, if people weren't scared of Zika virus for Rio or the contamination of Beijing or the terrorist menage of Salt Lake City...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.