Jump to content

NHS segment

Recommended Posts

But 1948 was certainly not the only Games to do that.

Even if it were, are you really going to argue this is sufficient acknowledgement of London's previous two Olympics? One interview seen by a tiny percentage of Olympic viewers in which Heatherwick mentions that the 1948 cauldron was low and off to the side as well? That's enough acknowledgement of London's Olympic history? Seriously?

Please read before attacking me. I already wrote a couple of posts before that I don't think that that was sufficient acknowledgement and that they could have had a reference to the 1908 and 1948 Games at least in the Pandemonium segment where they displayed two other events of 1908 and 1948, the suffragettes' march and the arrival of the Windrush. I don't understand why you react that aggressively, anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 101
  • Created
  • Last Reply


This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Create New...