Kenadian Posted July 28, 2012 Report Share Posted July 28, 2012 Easy. If you have gas spewing out of 200+ vents, they'll catch fire quickly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotguy Posted July 28, 2012 Report Share Posted July 28, 2012 Can you really say that lighting was on the same level as the flaming arrow at Barcelona of the ring of fire in the arising flame and waterfall of Sydney? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gabeUSA Posted July 28, 2012 Report Share Posted July 28, 2012 Okay, first thing, the nations received a replica of one in the Cauldron I am assuming. I INTENTIONALLY AM USING ALL CAPS BECAUSE I AM STEAMING PISSED. THE CAULDRON AWESOME, GREAT JOB, THE LIGHTING EMOTIONAL AND AWESOME AS WELL AS INSPIRING. BUT ITS CLOSED OFF FROM THE PUBLIC. SPEAKING AS A PERSON THAT HAS SEEN TWO CAULDRONS IN PERSON IT IS A SIGHT TO BEHOLD, EVEN THE UGLY McDONALDS FRENCH FRY BOX FROM ATLANTA 1996. BUT SERIOUSLY INSPIRE A GENERATION, AS LONG AS YOU BUY A TICKET. WTF?1?! ALL PEOPLE DESERVE TO SEE THE CAULDRON, FOR FREE, NOT THE COST OF AN ATHLETIC EVENT OR A JOURNEY TO THE TOP OF A TOWER. I HAVE LOVED ALL THAT LONDON HAS DONE UNTIL NOW. I AM LET DOWN BY ITS LOCATION AS OF NOW, IF IT STAYS ONLY SEEN FROM WITHIN THE STADIUM, ON A PLATFORM OR NOT, IF IT CANNOT BE SEEN BY ALL ITS A FAILURE! I AM SO SORRY THAT THOMAS HEATHERWICK'S GREAT DESIGN CAN ONLY BE SEEN BY THE WORLD'S LUCKIEST AND RICHEST PEOPLE. TO THAT I SAY LOCOG YOU FAILED US ALL!!! LETS HOPE DAWN BRINGS A VIEW OF THE CAULDRON FOR ALL, OR THIS CAULDRON IS A FAILURE BECAUSE OF ELITIST BULLS@#T! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NY20?? Posted July 28, 2012 Report Share Posted July 28, 2012 As far as cauldron designs go, I would put this one under "ok". Not as terrible as Torino's, but not as fantastic as Salt Lake's. I do think it would've looked wonderful in a high, prominent position "blossoming" and retracting throughout the Games. Too bad that's not going to happen. And the flame itself is awkwardly shaped on top of it and does burn very elegant like say Sydney's did. The lighting itself lacked drama and monumentality. In this department, Sydney and Barcelona can breath easy for another two years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soaring Posted July 28, 2012 Report Share Posted July 28, 2012 I was very disappointed that it is contained fully inside the stadium. It should be high up for all to see... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NY20?? Posted July 28, 2012 Report Share Posted July 28, 2012 *does not burn very elegantly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baron-pierreIV Posted July 28, 2012 Report Share Posted July 28, 2012 So who claims prediction honour? RobH and Paul were pretty spot on. Anyone else? (I'm not going back over 250-odd pages!) Well, about 3 days ago, I was sticking up for a hole in the ground. So on that score, I was right. Plus the jetpack thing...altho I jokingly had that for QE2. Little did I know that she was a 'skyjumprix.' (But there were 2 or 3 other jetpeople in the show.) As far as cauldron designs go, I would put this one under "ok". Not as terrible as Torino's, but not as fantastic as Salt Lake's. I do think it would've looked wonderful in a high, prominent position "blossoming" and retracting throughout the Games. Too bad that's not going to happen. And the flame itself is awkwardly shaped on top of it and does burn very elegant like say Sydney's did. It's like 100 birthday cake candles starting to stick to each other. Yeah, a coming together is one way to look at it...on the other hand, one could say that the English rose was closing onto itself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Rols Posted July 28, 2012 Report Share Posted July 28, 2012 Well, about 3 days ago, I was sticking up for a hole in the ground. So on that score, I was right. Plus the jetpack thing...altho I jokingly had that for QE2. Little did I know that she was a 'skyjumprix.' (But there were 2 or 3 other jetpeople in the show.) It's like 100 birthday cake candles starting to stick to each other. Yeah, a coming together is one way to look at it...on the other hand, one could say that the English rose was closing onto itself. Mate, I'll give you kudos, you had Mary Poppins picked out in your book. And you got Cruella De Ville for a bonus! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baron-pierreIV Posted July 28, 2012 Report Share Posted July 28, 2012 Mate, I'll give you kudos, you had Mary Poppins picked out in your book. And you got Cruella De Ville for a bonus! Yeah, thanks. Forgot about that. Well, it would've been silly to disregard the wealth of British literature. Oh, my scenario was actually Poppins bringing in the torch/miner's lamp...but Peter Pan grabs it from her. They tussle for it, but Harry Potts. comes in and steals it from both of them. So I got 2 out of 3 on that one as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattygs Posted July 28, 2012 Report Share Posted July 28, 2012 Only downside of the cauldron (apart from it being in the stadium) is that there lacked the imense jubilation as the torches *kissed* the petals. Everyone was kind of waiting until the whole thing was lit, so it tok a while, there was no *BOOM* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gonzo Posted July 28, 2012 Report Share Posted July 28, 2012 I was very disappointed that it is contained fully inside the stadium. It should be high up for all to see... agreed should be an IOC edict that the flame should be seen at all times not locked behind closed doors Another LOCOG cockup Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baron-pierreIV Posted July 28, 2012 Report Share Posted July 28, 2012 agreed should be an IOC edict that the flame should be seen at all times not locked behind closed doors But why should it matter? 5 billion people will not be going to London and would've already seen it on TV; so why should it be so imperative that it be seen 'outside'? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotguy Posted July 28, 2012 Report Share Posted July 28, 2012 So is the cauldron going to stay in the centre of the stadium for the whole games, even during the athletics competition? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baron-pierreIV Posted July 28, 2012 Report Share Posted July 28, 2012 So is the cauldron going to stay in the centre of the stadium for the whole games, even during the athletics competition? No, supposedly it's being moved to where the Bell is/was. It's still pretty huge to have it sit there. That thing has 204 ducts all burning gas. Gives off a very large carbon footprint!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brickbuilder711 Posted July 28, 2012 Report Share Posted July 28, 2012 Having already read the bad news about the cauldron not being visible beyond the eyes of paying spectators yes I was upset but I was beyond that when the moment came. I watched it on TV... sublime. Heatherwick did a great job and design; I really loved how it was shaped like a bowl in essence. I don't know how, but the delivery of the moment in essence was truly moving and tear jerking and with me it takes quite a lot to do this. I guess one could say the emotion built up with the very elegant delivery to Sir Steve and the presence of all of the workers of the Park in the entrance. Of course it kept building up up to the point where the children hugged their "mentors" if you want to put it that way. Even you could see and hear it with Sir Paul and if you're in the US, the commentators sounded like they were hit with emotion. Big props to those who both guessed that children would light it and that it resembled the ticket; that was almost the big hint since the design was very Heatherwick. In the visual aspect I do favor Athens #1 with this, Sydney, and Beijing fighting for #2 but the delivery of this "moment" outstood the cauldron itself and it will definitely be inspiring for years into the future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotguy Posted July 28, 2012 Report Share Posted July 28, 2012 No, supposedly it's being moved to where the Bell is/was. It's still pretty huge to have it sit there. That thing has 204 ducts all burning gas. Gives off a very large carbon footprint!! Wouldn't they have to distinguish it to move it? I hate the idea of the main flame being distinguished and then relit - i know the y have the original flame, but its nice to think that once its lit at the opening then it burns for the full duration. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotguy Posted July 28, 2012 Report Share Posted July 28, 2012 Now the lighting itself - i could see where they were coming from with inspire a generation theme, but in years to come when we state the names of those who have lit the flames (Robello, Ali, Freeman etc), will we remember seven children? Would have been better if more past olympians had carried it in the stadium as they have earned it. How many of these kids will go on to glory? An olympian from each generation/decade from 1948, plus a child as a future olympian would have been good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baron-pierreIV Posted July 28, 2012 Report Share Posted July 28, 2012 It was a new touch...but 7?? And their dark green outfits were not very dynamic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotguy Posted July 28, 2012 Report Share Posted July 28, 2012 Now the lighting itself - i could see where they were coming from with inspire a generation theme, but in years to come when we state the names of those who have lit the flames (Robello, Ali, Freeman etc), will we remember seven children? Would have been better if more past olympians had carried it in the stadium as they have earned it. How many of these kids will go on to glory? An olympian from each generation/decade from 1948, plus a child as a future olympian would have been good. Imagine the roar from the crowd as Redgrave, Homes, Gunnell, Christie, Lewis, Bannister, Hoy, Peters, Thomson and one of the kids had stood around that cauldron and lit it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Olympian2004 Posted July 28, 2012 Report Share Posted July 28, 2012 Now I have to eat humble pie - I really didn't believe that they would give away the cauldron's look on thousands of ceremony tickets. They were so extremely silent about the cauldron that it's still a bit strange that they threw the cauldron's look in our faces nevertheless. So congratulations to everyone who guessed that look, especially to RobH and paul! The cauldron's design is incredibly clever and symbolic - a wonderful idea! It's extremely innovative and the camera shots from below are simply stunning, almost unreal. It's disappointing, though, that the cauldron will not only be visible only from within the stadium but also will be taken down at the end of the Games so that it won't become a memorial in the Olympic Park later on. However, this is probably one of the most beautiful cauldrons of Olympic history, although I somewhat prefer Sydney's futuristic and impressive design. Regarding the cauldron lighters: Well, it's a bit sobering that after all that speculation, some unknown young athletes and Games ambassadors lit the flame and Roger Bannister wasn't even part of the segment at all. But it's absolutely true: It's very fitting for the Games' motto "Inspire a generation" and the whole philosophy of the London Games. And maybe some of those young athletes will become famous later on. Regarding the location: I'm surprised that the cauldron will be where the bell sat. This way, it will block the view onto the jumbotrons on that end of the stadium. Will they perhaps keep the temporary screens on the roof on that side of the stadium so that the viewers on the opposite side can view the action and the results? So far, the cauldron apparently hasn't been moved, by the way. The Olympic broadcast on ZDF has just started and they showed apparent live pictures taken from that stunning perspective in the centre below the burning petals. And you could see the ring of the rigging above it, which is suspended over the centre of the infield. One couldn't really recognise the flame from that perspective, though. Maybe they should reconsider using that camera perspective when it's still daylight. Oh, and I forgot the lighting method: It wasn't extremely exciting. They dipped their torches into some of the petals, the flame wandered around and those hydraulic arms came together. Technically, Barcelona's and Sydney's cauldron lightings still remain the most impressive ones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotguy Posted July 28, 2012 Report Share Posted July 28, 2012 Without looking it up, can anyone name who lit the flames from 1984 onwards, including London? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob2012 Posted July 28, 2012 Report Share Posted July 28, 2012 No Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattygs Posted July 28, 2012 Report Share Posted July 28, 2012 Without looking it up, can anyone name who lit the flames from 1984 onwards, including London? Nearly, but I'd fail when it came to Seoul. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
willwalk Posted July 28, 2012 Report Share Posted July 28, 2012 Is there still a chance the cauldron will be moved to the top of the stadium for everybody to see or is it likely to stay somewhere inside the stadium likewise in 1948, 1976 and 1988 games? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Olympian2012 Posted July 28, 2012 Report Share Posted July 28, 2012 Wouldn't they have to distinguish it to move it? I hate the idea of the main flame being distinguished and then relit - i know the y have the original flame, but its nice to think that once its lit at the opening then it burns for the full duration. i agree, once it is lit....it should remain lit Okay, first thing, the nations received a replica of one in the Cauldron I am assuming. I INTENTIONALLY AM USING ALL CAPS BECAUSE I AM STEAMING PISSED. THE CAULDRON AWESOME, GREAT JOB, THE LIGHTING EMOTIONAL AND AWESOME AS WELL AS INSPIRING. BUT ITS CLOSED OFF FROM THE PUBLIC. SPEAKING AS A PERSON THAT HAS SEEN TWO CAULDRONS IN PERSON IT IS A SIGHT TO BEHOLD, EVEN THE UGLY McDONALDS FRENCH FRY BOX FROM ATLANTA 1996. BUT SERIOUSLY INSPIRE A GENERATION, AS LONG AS YOU BUY A TICKET. WTF?1?! ALL PEOPLE DESERVE TO SEE THE CAULDRON, FOR FREE, NOT THE COST OF AN ATHLETIC EVENT OR A JOURNEY TO THE TOP OF A TOWER. I HAVE LOVED ALL THAT LONDON HAS DONE UNTIL NOW. I AM LET DOWN BY ITS LOCATION AS OF NOW, IF IT STAYS ONLY SEEN FROM WITHIN THE STADIUM, ON A PLATFORM OR NOT, IF IT CANNOT BE SEEN BY ALL ITS A FAILURE! I AM SO SORRY THAT THOMAS HEATHERWICK'S GREAT DESIGN CAN ONLY BE SEEN BY THE WORLD'S LUCKIEST AND RICHEST PEOPLE. TO THAT I SAY LOCOG YOU FAILED US ALL!!! LETS HOPE DAWN BRINGS A VIEW OF THE CAULDRON FOR ALL, OR THIS CAULDRON IS A FAILURE BECAUSE OF ELITIST BULLS@#T! i agreed too....even though it looks nice, the cauldron should always rise above the stadium..... it loses the Olympic magic when it can not be seen glittering about the Olympic Park Skyline. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.