Quaker2001 Posted May 16, 2014 Report Share Posted May 16, 2014 My impressions are the same. ALSO a complete makeover of La Guardia airport, it's the most convenient for domestic users and really needs a do over! Who owns it? City or Port? City of NY owns LGA and JFK. Port Authority owns EWR and operates all 3. LGA in particular has seen some renovations in recent years. Don't know that a complete makeover is possible. Neither of the 3 airports has a very large footprint, so there's only so much that can be done. As opposed to, say, ORD where a complete and total redesign of the airfield is possible. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Team USA Posted May 16, 2014 Report Share Posted May 16, 2014 LGA SUCKS (also not international) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quaker2001 Posted May 16, 2014 Report Share Posted May 16, 2014 LGA SUCKS (also not international) So I guess BR2028 wasn't kidding, we really did take over Canada, thus making this domestic??... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Team USA Posted May 16, 2014 Report Share Posted May 16, 2014 You got me there but that the only full time international destination Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BR2028 Posted May 16, 2014 Report Share Posted May 16, 2014 So I guess BR2028 wasn't kidding, we really did take over Canada, thus making this domestic??... Well if you look at our economies, Canada is very reliant upon the US. I have done business up North and you would be surprised. With the NA Trade agreement and Russia's growing influence at the poles it's only a matter of time until the borders come down and America get's 13 new states. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stryker Posted May 16, 2014 Report Share Posted May 16, 2014 City of NY owns LGA and JFK. Port Authority owns EWR and operates all 3. LGA in particular has seen some renovations in recent years. Don't know that a complete makeover is possible. Neither of the 3 airports has a very large footprint, so there's only so much that can be done. As opposed to, say, ORD where a complete and total redesign of the airfield is possible. While a complete renovation of LGA is not possible, it would be possible to extend a metro line to the airport. On a side note about LGA, it wasn't that long ago that Vice President Joe Biden was at the airport and he referred to it as a "third world country." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alexjc Posted May 16, 2014 Report Share Posted May 16, 2014 Very dated terminal what he said, and a recent doco on it shows a major upgrade is long overdue for the terminal. I'm just thinking its close proximity to Flushing Meadows in a possible plan. In 2012, little London City really worked it's arse off, and that pretty much sits on a dock. A great complement to London's two major and two regional airports. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zekekelso Posted May 16, 2014 Report Share Posted May 16, 2014 LGA has no border control facilities to receive international flights. Because Passengers from Canada go through preclearance in Canada, they are treated as domestic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alexjc Posted May 16, 2014 Report Share Posted May 16, 2014 Thought as much...Great for the domestic market though. Does have a private international security clearance, great for IOC diplomatic reps to use in that bubble of a world they live in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
intoronto Posted May 16, 2014 Report Share Posted May 16, 2014 Well if you look at our economies, Canada is very reliant upon the US. I have done business up North and you would be surprised. With the NA Trade agreement and Russia's growing influence at the poles it's only a matter of time until the borders come down and America get's 13 new states. So reliant Canada's economy did worse then the USA during the recession of 2008. End sarcasm. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zekekelso Posted May 16, 2014 Report Share Posted May 16, 2014 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr.bernham Posted May 16, 2014 Report Share Posted May 16, 2014 547 pages of good discussion ruined twice by the same troll...Gott, I'm starting a petition to ban BR2028 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ofan Posted May 16, 2014 Report Share Posted May 16, 2014 547 pages of good discussion ruined twice by the same troll...Gott, I'm starting a petition to ban BR2028 I will sign. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quaker2001 Posted May 16, 2014 Report Share Posted May 16, 2014 547 pages of good discussion ruined twice by the same troll...Gott, I'm starting a petition to ban BR2028 Do we really want that though? I mean come on, if BR2028 leaves us again, who is gonna keep us updated on the mag-lev rail line between New Orleans and Baton Rouge!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woohooitsme83 Posted May 17, 2014 Report Share Posted May 17, 2014 Do we really want that though? I mean come on, if BR2028 leaves us again, who is gonna keep us updated on the mag-lev rail line between New Orleans and Baton Rouge!? pffffft... fugget dat. its all bout da California High Speed Rail. WOOT! Which BTW iz soooo close to be built if it aint fur da NIBYs. Oh and da China-Russia-Canada-'MERICA Line iz pretty bicg too. Gotta keep wit da latest trands, man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Team USA Posted May 17, 2014 Report Share Posted May 17, 2014 547 pages of good discussion ruined twice by the same troll...Gott, I'm starting a petition to ban BR2028 I will sign. CYBERBULLING 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ofan Posted May 17, 2014 Report Share Posted May 17, 2014 CYBERBULLING Lol Randall. Difference is, BR2028 is a racist and nationalistic troll. Tony is just an uniformed kid. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr.bernham Posted May 17, 2014 Report Share Posted May 17, 2014 Lol Randall. Difference is, BR2028 is a racist and nationalistic troll. Tony is just an uniformed kid. It's called parodying other members here... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ofan Posted May 17, 2014 Report Share Posted May 17, 2014 It's called parodying other members here... Except he's not funny in any way. No one enjoys his posts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alexjc Posted May 17, 2014 Report Share Posted May 17, 2014 It's called parodying other members here... And he's not overly funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr.bernham Posted May 17, 2014 Report Share Posted May 17, 2014 I'm not saying he is, just making fun of his 'logic'. I'll start the petition to kick him off on Change.org... I hope that is taken as a joke by everyone here...you never know these days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alexjc Posted May 17, 2014 Report Share Posted May 17, 2014 I reply to his comments with light banter and indifference....also noticed he has dissappeared for now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr.bernham Posted May 18, 2014 Report Share Posted May 18, 2014 I reply to his comments with light banter and indifference....also noticed he has dissappeared for now. He had like a four month disappearance. He was really active and in troll mode in like July to the vote, then he disappeared and did not return till a few months ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woohooitsme83 Posted May 18, 2014 Report Share Posted May 18, 2014 He's the NSA. THEY'RE TRYING TO BRAINWASH US ALL!!! ... ... ... ALL HAIL THE GREAT AND POWERFUL, MIGHTY AMERICA!!!!!!!! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Athensfan Posted May 26, 2014 Author Report Share Posted May 26, 2014 The following articles provides some great insights into the anti-Olympic position in NYC. The primary concerns seem to be the "condescending" and imperious IOC, improper land use and the diversion of funds and human resources away from thoughtful urban development and civic organization. The author makes it clear that NYC should not allow itself to get sucked into the IOC's game "ever again." http://m.nydailynews.com/sports/bondy-nyc-2024-olympics-article-1.1793616 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts