Citius Altius Fortius Posted May 17, 2011 Report Share Posted May 17, 2011 The 'Kandahar' can be used as planned, since the Land owners agreed to a contract.. That means another boost for Munich's bid for 2018! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westfale Posted May 17, 2011 Report Share Posted May 17, 2011 Great news and a real boost for Munich! I am very often a sceptical person, but meanwhile I think Munich has a real chance. Witt will sway the votes to her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nature Posted May 17, 2011 Report Share Posted May 17, 2011 God bless Munich for 2018. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neige Posted May 17, 2011 Report Share Posted May 17, 2011 Good for Munich... not so good for us... However, it's better to compete on the sport field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Rols Posted May 17, 2011 Report Share Posted May 17, 2011 That's exactly the type of good news story to have, at the right time, to start to ramp up the positive coverage in the home stretch. I'll be watching for more such positive announcements. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jawnbc Posted May 19, 2011 Report Share Posted May 19, 2011 Wow glad that's sorted!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolympia Posted May 21, 2011 Report Share Posted May 21, 2011 Only ony piece of land is safe, a lot of important different pieces aren't available for the games yet (says the lawywer of the landowners) - for example there are still problems with a piece of land for the halfpipe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Citius Altius Fortius Posted May 21, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 21, 2011 Only ony piece of land is safe, a lot of important different pieces aren't available for the games yet (says the lawywer of the landowners) - for example there are still problems with a piece of land for the halfpipe. let's wait and see how it will work out - you can always find other possibilities... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolympia Posted May 21, 2011 Report Share Posted May 21, 2011 May be you find other possibilities, may be not! Fact is: The Germans do NOT have 100% of the land they need, the Koreans have 100%. Would you like to invest 6 MRD Dollars in a project, what is such risky? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Citius Altius Fortius Posted May 21, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 21, 2011 well, "Korea" has 100%, since the area where the Winter Olympics should be held is owned by a single company... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nature Posted May 21, 2011 Report Share Posted May 21, 2011 well, "Korea" has 100%, since the area where the Winter Olympics should be held is owned by a single company... Narita airport in Japan or Now situation in Garmisch is impossible in Korea. Korea and Germany is different. If driving any policies for public projects in Korea, residents must sell the private property for public projects. The residents can't resist it. Germany is a democratic society more than Korea. There is no problem to the Olympics host even if still have a few problems on the land, according to information I have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolympia Posted May 23, 2011 Report Share Posted May 23, 2011 Of course there are a lot of problems, which aren't published yet. F.e. the packets of land, which aren't available for the Olympic games in Munich. 55.000 m² owned by 12 landowners -important for the games (for example for the halfpipe) aren't available. For german speakinig readers here the letter of the landowner's lawyer Seitz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Citius Altius Fortius Posted May 24, 2011 Author Report Share Posted May 24, 2011 I'm astonished that you have access to a pdf-file of a letter of a lawyer - was that published? Furthermore are two things interesting concerning the letter: - it was written after the NOlympia-movement lost their referendum in Garmisch-Partenkirchen - it was written before the agreement with the Kandahar landowner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.