Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Kenadian

BC Place Stadium - The roof WILL finally collapse

Recommended Posts

I think they liked bragging about being the first indoor opening ceremony. :)

The rain would have put a damper on things (mind the pun). The stadium also looks even more visually unappealing with the roof gone. Like a concrete wall at the end of Robson Street.

Having the waterfront cauldron was the best idea. The ugly chain link fence was a massive mistake, but by most accounts, I've heard this was one of, if not the most accessible Olympic flame ever. To snap it in other cities meant getting into the stadium area and behind the security zone, and that usually required a ticket. For Vancouver, you just had to show up at the foot of Thurlow Street.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

today from live interior webcam....imagine if the 2010 ceremonies were in an open-air venue:

place.png

That looks so bizarre, and much smaller. Looking forward to seeing the next incarnation of this stadium. B)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This afternoon I noticed that there are now three masts in place at BC Place...the new roof seems to be going up quite quickly!

Story from CKNW.

bc_place_reno2.jpg

Edited by Kendegra

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Only 2 years too late. That is, when this should have started.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Was there any reason why they chose not to remove the roof before the Olympic Winter Games?

Wouldn't it have saved them a lot of trouble when it came to the lighting of the flame, one cauldron high above the arena rather than the indoor/ outdoor arrangement that left quite a lot be be desired - plus fireworks could be used?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Was there any reason why they chose not to remove the roof before the Olympic Winter Games?

Wouldn't it have saved them a lot of trouble when it came to the lighting of the flame, one cauldron high above the arena rather than the indoor/ outdoor arrangement that left quite a lot be be desired - plus fireworks could be used?

It has been discussed a thousand times. But essentially, the reason the renovations happened after the Olympics and not before were because the renovation plan didn't come about until a few years ago (it takes time to assess a structure, find a design, and engineer it). Then with all the Olympic construction and the tight deadline of February 12, 2010, the provincial government (owners of the stadium) didn't want to commit to a lower priority project that would compete for resources going into other higher priority Olympic related projects (sport venues, the villages, highway to Whistler, train to the airport). They feared that the half billion dollar price estimate would expand out of control in such a busy market place and that, worst of the worst, they would end up super rushed like Athens or worse still like Montreal with a not fully completed venue. A missing leg on a cauldron is unfortunate. A missing quarter of a stadium is down right embarrassing.

As it was, BC Place was only used for ceremonial events. Not sports. They spruced it up, covered some things up, and really, you probably would have even noticed the difference all that much on TV.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for answering the question Kendegra. Apologies haven't been following the history of BC Place's roof and what was going on with that stadium.

I must say that the projections used during the ceremonies were very sharp and perhaps the best so far of any ceremony, and i'm sure in the indoor "complete darkness" contributed to that effectiveness as compared to an outdoor venue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

While the indoor environment made for great projections, there was one big issue that the new retractable roof would have resolved and eliminated. The previous roof was air inflated, meaning they had to be careful with the usage of the doors so that not too much air leaks outside at any one time. This was also troubling for the projections as it would mean the position of the projections onto the drapes were always changing due to a slightly sagging/inflating roof.

And of course, the air pressurized stadium also limited what they could do indoors...in terms of bringing in performers, big props, etc.

So really, they had two big limitations at BC Place: indoor environment (though great for projections) and air pressurized environment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

While the indoor environment made for great projections, there was one big issue that the new retractable roof would have resolved and eliminated. The previous roof was air inflated, meaning they had to be careful with the usage of the doors so that not too much air leaks outside at any one time. This was also troubling for the projections as it would mean the position of the projections onto the drapes were always changing due to a slightly sagging/inflating roof.

I'm surprised Gretzky's torch didn't blow out when going thru the airlocks - there was always that little blast of breeze when you went thru.

And I'm going to sidetrack slightly...

How's the roof replacement at Canada Place going?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It would be nice to see the Stadium hosting an international track and field events.

From youtube by Kira1106. A small replica model of the stadium. I love the lights.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^Haha the moron asking about the super bowls at BC Place.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm surprised Gretzky's torch didn't blow out when going thru the airlocks - there was always that little blast of breeze when you went thru.

And I'm going to sidetrack slightly...

How's the roof replacement at Canada Place going?

The flame on the torch is designed to withstand -40 degrees C and gusts in excess of 60 km/h...the airlocks weren't a problem.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^Haha the moron asking about the super bowls at BC Place.

it would be nice thouugh. but it'll be smallest super bowl venue if it happens.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Super Bowl in Canada? Never. It has only ever made it out of the Sun Belt 3 times in its entire existence. And I can't see Vancouver bumping ahead of New York, Chicago or Boston (none of them have hosted either). Closest it would come might be Seattle. Actually, there's an idea! Quest Field can host up to 72,000 but of course Seattle's famous rains might be a problem.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

NYC is hosting in 2014. first outdoor winter super bowl.

Indianapolis is hosting 2012

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've heard, though not sure if this is true, that with the new retractable roof the seating capacity will be reduced from its current 60,000 to 55,000.

There was "talk" about a year ago of offering the stadium free to the NFL to host the Superbowl and they would even receive some of the food concession revenues. Bleacher seats can also be added along the rim of the field as there's like a 15-foot drop between the first row of seats and the field. In addition, Canadian Football fields are a bit bigger than American ones....so that would maybe increase stadium capacity to 65,000?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it's ugly.

I miss the old marshmallow

I see all those lights and I'm thinking Disneyland Electrical Parade. Cue the Baroque Hoedown music. :lol: Could be the new theme song for the Lions. :lol::P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does Vancouver even have an NFL team? So why should the SuperBowl be played there? It only goes to cities which have a team and/or sunshine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does Vancouver even have an NFL team? So why should the SuperBowl be played there? It only goes to cities which have a team and/or sunshine.

No. There's no NFL teams in Canada. It's just confusion. A lot of people think the Lions are in the NFL but they aren't. They are in the CFL.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the foreign superbowl was intensified last year when London was rumoured to be bidding to host them in 2014. i think some reporters said it will be likely the superbowl be held in canada first before london can stage them and only after 2016.

they're actually looking to bring super bowl 50 to LA since super bowl 1 was held in LA and so far LA doesn't have an NFL team.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For a small fraction of Vancouver's cost, the Singaporeans sure put on an amazing show that trumps ours in some ways...the arrival of the flame and lighting of the cauldron was especially amazing. Vancouver's show was just far too theatrical, and lacked that epicness that everyone could appreciate. Not everyone is a fan nor can they understand the artsy interpretation that Vancouver had, which I think is why Vancouver's Opening was something you either liked or didn't like.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That was the only good thing about Singapore was the ligthing of the Cauldron everyhting else was copied from previous Olympic ceremonies. Vancouver was more original in their presentation.

For a small fraction of Vancouver's cost, the Singaporeans sure put on an amazing show that trumps ours in some ways...the arrival of the flame and lighting of the cauldron was especially amazing. Vancouver's show was just far too theatrical, and lacked that epicness that everyone could appreciate. Not everyone is a fan nor can they understand the artsy interpretation that Vancouver had, which I think is why Vancouver's Opening was something you either liked or didn't like.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't miss the marshmallow at all. In fact, I'm very much looking forward to the rack of lamb!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...