Jump to content

The Bookies Say ...


Sir Rols

Recommended Posts

Am I the only one who finds these bet figures incredibvly confusing? o.o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay - betting markets are expressed in terms of ratios of how much you will be paid back if you bet a dollar on it.

For example, in the odds above, Chicago is given a price of 4/5 in quite a few of them. That means you need to bet $4 if you want to make back $5 if they win - a 20 per cent return.

Rio is priced at 2. That means if you bet $1, and they win, you will double your money and get back $2. Believe me, that is really changing. A few weeks ago, there were odds of 4.5/1 for Rio, meaning if I bet $1, I'd get $4.50 if they won.

The odds change depending on how much money is being bet on the particular choices. If most people are expecyting Chicago to win, and most of the money is being bet on them, the return will be less than the others and keep getting less as m0ore money is put on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are not used to this since bets are prohibited in Brazil...

This is how I read the odds:

Reading down the first two columns:

--------------------------- Boylesports -------- Betfred

Chicago ---------------------- 4/5 -------------- 4/5

Rio ---------------------------- 2 ----------------- 2

Tokyo ------------------------- 11/2 ------------- 6

Madrid ------------------------- 12 --------------- 12

The probability of a win, according to Boylesports is:

Chicago: For every 9 identical elections, 4 losses to Chicago, 5 wins to Chicago. Likelihood of Chicago winning is 5/9 or about 55.6%

Rio: For every 3 identical elections, 2 losses to Rio, 1 win to Rio. Likelihood of Rio winning is 1/3 or about 33.3%

Tokyo: For every 13 identical elections, 11 losses to Tokyo, 2 wins to Tokyo. Likelihood of Tokyo winning is 2/13 or about 15.4%

Madrid: For every 13 identical elections, 12 losses to Madrid, 1 win to Madrid. Likelihood of Madrid winning is 1/12 or about 8.33%

I think this is how it works:

for a $1 bet on Chicago, if Chicago wins, the return is $1 * (1/55.6%) or about $1.80

for a $1 bet on Rio, if Rio wins, the return is $1 * (1/33.3%) or about $3

for a $1 bet on Tokyo, if Tokyo wins, the return is $1 * (1/15.4%) or about $6.49

for a $1 bet on Madrid, if Madrid wins, the return is $1 * (1/8.33%) or about $13

CHItown '16

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is how I read the odds:

Reading down the first two columns:

--------------------------- Boylesports -------- Betfred

Chicago ---------------------- 4/5 -------------- 4/5

Rio ---------------------------- 2 ----------------- 2

Tokyo ------------------------- 11/2 ------------- 6

Madrid ------------------------- 12 --------------- 12

The probability of a win, according to Boylesports is:

Chicago: For every 9 identical elections, 4 losses to Chicago, 5 wins to Chicago. Likelihood of Chicago winning is 5/9 or about 55.6%

Rio: For every 3 identical elections, 2 losses to Rio, 1 win to Rio. Likelihood of Rio winning is 1/3 or about 33.3%

Tokyo: For every 13 identical elections, 11 losses to Tokyo, 2 wins to Tokyo. Likelihood of Tokyo winning is 2/13 or about 15.4%

Madrid: For every 13 identical elections, 12 losses to Madrid, 1 win to Madrid. Likelihood of Madrid winning is 1/12 or about 8.33%

I think this is how it works:

for a $1 bet on Chicago, if Chicago wins, the return is $1 * (1/55.6%) or about $1.80

for a $1 bet on Rio, if Rio wins, the return is $1 * (1/33.3%) or about $3

for a $1 bet on Tokyo, if Tokyo wins, the return is $1 * (1/15.4%) or about $6.49

for a $1 bet on Madrid, if Madrid wins, the return is $1 * (1/8.33%) or about $13

CHItown '16

You're reading them as probabilities - which they're not. They are based on money invested so far, and the returns the bookies are offering on bets. It's all based on how much money is wagered on the variuous items, and how much the bookies are now prepared to pay back for $1 bets if any of them win. Basically, they don't want to go broke. More money is being wagered on Chicago, based on these markets, so the return is much, much less than the others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...