Augie4040 Posted September 22, 2009 Report Share Posted September 22, 2009 NATIONAL LEAGUE: WEST: Seattle Mariners Colorado Rockies Arizona Diamondbacks Housron Astros Texas Rangers CENTRAL: Minnesota Twins Milwaukee Brewers Chicago Cubs Chicago White Sox Toronto Jays EAST: Boston Red Sox New York Yankees New York Mets Philadelphia Phillies Pittsburg Pirates AMERICAN LEAGUE: WEST: San Francisco Giants Oakland A's Anaheim Angels L.A. Dodgers San Diego Padres CENTRAL: Detroit Tigers Cincinnati Reds Cleveland Indians Kansas City Royals St. Louis Cardinals EAST: Baltimore Orioles Washington Nationals Atlanta Braves Tampa Bay Rays Florida Marlins Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Steel Posted September 22, 2009 Report Share Posted September 22, 2009 EAST:Boston Red Sox New York Yankees New York Mets Philadelphia Phillies Pittsburg Pirates Well, that's an even division. By the way, it's Pittsburgh. With an H. Big pet peeve of mine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olympian Posted September 22, 2009 Report Share Posted September 22, 2009 someone should learn how to spell "Houston" as well. I think somee is spending too much time doing nothing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Olympic USA Posted October 4, 2009 Report Share Posted October 4, 2009 Why on earth would you have both Chicago teams, both NY teams, both L.A. area teams, and both Washington DC/Baltimore area teams in not only the same league, but the same division? I agree that if a team is for example NL East it should be in the eastern part of the country but spread it out a little bid. And as a Braves fan I shudder at the thought of Atlanta being in the AL - at least you kept my Astros in the NL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
POV Posted October 5, 2009 Report Share Posted October 5, 2009 This is just plain silly. Just forgetting about the history of teams being in the American or National Leagues for decades, now we have to have interleague play all the time with an odd number of teams in each league. Silly, just plain silly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave199 Posted October 5, 2009 Report Share Posted October 5, 2009 This isn't really happening is it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Steel Posted October 5, 2009 Report Share Posted October 5, 2009 This isn't really happening is it? Heavens above, no. This is just his idea for re-aligning the league if the MLB to do so someday (which probably won't happen until they expand to 32 teams). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mangle Posted October 5, 2009 Report Share Posted October 5, 2009 Ha! I thought this was true I told my partner about this and he was shocked. I guess this just proves how closely I pay attention to baseball. Are they really planning on expanding to 32 teams or is this just another "could happen" thing? lol i would hate to be wrong twice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Steel Posted October 5, 2009 Report Share Posted October 5, 2009 Ha! I thought this was true I told my partner about this and he was shocked. I guess this just proves how closely I pay attention to baseball. Are they really planning on expanding to 32 teams or is this just another "could happen" thing? lol i would hate to be wrong twice I've heard no plans from MLB of expansion, though I recall it being discussed in passing a few years ago. Adding two more teams makes sense at some point. There are a lot of markets that would be great for baseball (Portland, San Antonio, Las Vegas among them), and it would even out the two leagues at 16 apiece. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Olympic USA Posted October 5, 2009 Report Share Posted October 5, 2009 I hadn't heard about San Antonio and Portland as possible contendors for a new MLB team. I know Charlotte was a candidate when the Expos were moving and way back in the 1990s when the Twins were threatening to leave Minneapolis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apple Posted October 5, 2009 Report Share Posted October 5, 2009 Can we seriously realign and shake up the NHL instead? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taichi Posted October 11, 2009 Report Share Posted October 11, 2009 I was thinking. I'm not sure if this will happen but I changed the realiginment. I put all the Eastern and Western conferences and put together in an NHL and NBA fashion. Take a look at this. Eastern Conference Northeast Division Cincinnati Reds Cleveland Indians Milwaukee Brewers Philadelphia Phillies Pittsburgh Pirates Atlantic Division Boston Detroit New York Mets New York Yankees Toronto Jays Southeast Division Atlanta Braves Florida Marlins Kansas City Royals Tampa Bay Rays Washington Nationals Western Conference Central Division Baltimore Orioles Chicago Cubs Chicago White Sox St.Louis Cardinals Minnesota Twins South West Division Arizona Diamondbacks Colorado Rockies Houston Astros Texas Rangers Seattle Mariners Pacific Division Los Angelas Angels Los Angelas Dodgers Oakland Athletics San Fransisco Giants San Diego Padres Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
777rak Posted October 11, 2009 Report Share Posted October 11, 2009 Just now saw this topic. I like your idea augie. I have been saying the need to redo the divions in baseball. Every division should have 5 NOT 4 (like the AL West has) or 6 (like the NL Central) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Steel Posted October 11, 2009 Report Share Posted October 11, 2009 Just now saw this topic. I like your idea augie. I have been saying the need to redo the divions in baseball. Every division should have 5 NOT 4 (like the AL West has) or 6 (like the NL Central) But they have to do it that way, or there would be an odd number of teams in each league, and interleague games would have to be played all year long. That's just not something the traditionalists at Major League Baseball would want, especially in the late season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
777rak Posted October 31, 2010 Report Share Posted October 31, 2010 But they have to do it that way, or there would be an odd number of teams in each league, and interleague games would have to be played all year long. That's just not something the traditionalists at Major League Baseball would want, especially in the late season. Sorry about the realyyyyyyyyyyyyyy late reply There is an even number of teams 30. 16 in the NL and 14 in AL. Or what they could do is move say the Rockies the NL West and then bring the Astors over to the NL West Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Detroit Posted November 1, 2010 Report Share Posted November 1, 2010 NATIONAL LEAGUE: EAST: Atlanta Braves Florida(Miami) Marlins Washington Nationals Philadelphia Phillies Pittsburgh Pirates New York Mets(What the heck is a met anyway?) CENTRAL: Chicago Cubs St.Louis Cardinals Cincinnati Reds Texas Rangers Milwaukee Brewers WEST: Los Angeles Dodgers Arizona Diamondbacks San Francisco Giants San Diego Padres Colorado Rockies AMERICAN LEAGUE: WEST: Kansas City Oakland Athletics Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim(in Spanish, it is Los Angeles Angeles de Anaheim... Hilarious! :lol: ) Seattle Mariners CENTRAL: Detroit Tigers Toronto Blue Jays Boston Red Sox Chicago White Sox Minnesota Twins EAST: Tampa Bay Rays Cleveland Indians New York Yankees Baltimore Orioles Houston Astros(screw the geography, a flight is a flight) I think these are some balanced divisions. Just switching the Astros and the Rangers, and putting my Tigers with those dang Blue Jays, and the Red Sox. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.