Jump to content

fatixxx

Members
  • Posts

    742
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Everything posted by fatixxx

  1. istanbul2020a1.png

    INVITATION LINK ==>

    Istanbul 2020 - SubForum - Invitation

  2. istanbul2020a1.png

    INVITATION LINK ==>

    Istanbul 2020 - SubForum - Invitation

  3. istanbul2020a1.png

    INVITATION LINK ==>

    Istanbul 2020 - SubForum - Invitation

  4. istanbul2020a1.png

    INVITATION LINK ==>

    Istanbul 2020 - SubForum - Invitation

  5. istanbul2020a1.png

    INVITATION LINK ==>

    Istanbul 2020 - SubForum - Invitation

  6. istanbul2020a1.png

    INVITATION LINK ==>

    Istanbul 2020 - SubForum - Invitation

  7. istanbul2020a1.png

    INVITATION LINK ==>

    Istanbul 2020 - SubForum - Invitation

  8. istanbul2020a1.png

    INVITATION LINK ==>

    Istanbul 2020 - SubForum - Invitation

  9. istanbul2020a1.png

    INVITATION LINK ==>

    Istanbul 2020 - SubForum - Invitation

  10. istanbul2020a1.png

    INVITATION LINK ==>

    Istanbul 2020 - SubForum - Invitation

  11. istanbul2020a1.png

    INVITATION LINK ==>

  12. Baku & Doha are IN .. But they SOON will be OUT !!

    1. Soaring

      Soaring

      Doha will no doubt be a candidate. Baku is out, and a chance that Istanbul might join them.

    2. FYI

      FYI

      When it comes to the fanciful IOC, no one can say "no doubt" about anything when it comes to those capricious, Swiss old ladies.

    3. DannyelBrazil

      DannyelBrazil

      The racing will be tough, good luck for the bidders! =]

  13. Baku an Doha are IN .. But they SOON will be OUT !!

  14. Ahtens has a point there; If we are looking to the last medal tables in the last 3-4 years at other big/middle great sports organisations, than we can clearly see that the USA is loosing blood in the frame of gaining a lot medals with the new genearitions to come. E.g; 26th World Summer Universiade in Shenzhen 2011 (a city just annexed along with hong kong on the map) USA came 5th; http://match.sz2011.org/Medal/ENG.htm (medal table rankings) China, Russia, South Korea are really getting stonger by each year .. year by year.
  15. I don't want to sound stupid, but have a totally another kind of thinking. It's the first time I will write on a USA topic. In the last month a lot of thinking of several members focusses on bidding timelapses, e.g. As for the US; WOG 2022-2032 SOG or WOG 2026-2036 SOG. But in my view thought this could be; SOG 2024-2034. I especially support Athensfan's signatur that the USOC must go to an Summer Olympic Games as 2024 will be 28 years after Atlanta. Because otherwis if the usoc goes to bid for SOG's for 2032 or 2036 than it will be 36-40 years later than Atlanta and that means that the USA can miss out not 2-3 but 3 till 4 generations without any SOG on US-Soil. As the matter a fact the WOG's are more dedicated for the northern hemisphere, whereby US athletes will cross only the Atlantic to Europe to ensure the increasing succes of US winter-sports, if not China bids with Harbin. If the USOC goes for a 2022 WOG (20 years later than SL and 12 after Vancouver) than this strategy will jeopardise all the new US-generations for an eventually Olympic on US-soil. So said that as an thinking-method. But the otherside of the medal now. Now we have the eventually 2024 Durban factor. I think that an South African bid will be ready with Cape Town than a premature Durban. Knowing in the backmind that the IOC can accept an september-october timelap for Cape Town about better summerwether as they did recently with Doha. Otherwise Durban will still be a premature even in 2024. For god sake? (in positive sense) What will/can Durban afford as a valuable plus as a city that not even will be at the organizationsl size of that of Atlanta. Here on GB a lot of members talk about the fact that the IOC goes for bigger(if not larger) cities that have more in place about the venues aspect. Why pushing Durban forward who has to handle eventually with Boats/Botels and has to organize mathes more in (temporary) convention centers then in real venues. Will this be the valuable PLUS that Durban will bring to the Olympic History ?? Durban is just a small(er) city that has to push and force chances and opportunities to oranize a decent olympics. In this case the Sascoc & the Usoc did a strategically good job to sit out (for both) the 2020 bidding phase. You can say that from now on (2012) till 2024 there can chang a lot in 12 years. But still Durban is a city on the coast in the southern hemispher and is not a stategically city in terms of creating huge economic surroundings. Than an eventually Cape Town is more privileged on 2 issues; larger city + better wether circumstances (sept-oct) as already exercised with sydney. And last but not least. If the IOC has to Africa (as a whole) than Morocco can spoil the chances of Durban in 2024 as Doha did now with Istanbul for the 2020 race. We all know that South-Africa is getting more prised towards the rest of Africa. Also that the FIFA stole (imo) the chances of Morocco for the FIFA 2010 and awarded to RSA. Now Morocco can say it is revenge time and we have a coin to count with South-Africa. An Eventually race between Casablanca/Rabat with CT/Durban can be very harsh maybe. Meanwhile Chicago can spoil whole the thing and can take te 2024 Olympics. As Casablanca/Rabat do have more possibilities on several issues like wether/venues/larger trasportation possibilitis (rail, freeway and airports) & Accomodation. Yes indeed, there can happen everything in 10-12 years. But I just want to say not be sure about a winning Durban in 2017 for 2024. Chicago will have huge/great chance of winning 2024. Last but not least, Durban will not be a real Olympics, but more a half-real/half fake olympics because a forced/pushed bid to ensure every issue/guarantees that the IOC wants (as a Doha Olympics will also be fake). As I said. Durban is a premature and still will be in 2024. A WC isn't the Olympics. regards fatih
  16. Baron .. thank you again for neutralizing about the rep pt. But normally non-premium members can't give neg.rep.pt. It was surely a premium member. I don't want to know who it was, but why it was. Thanx again.

  17. Why are members giving negative reputation points for a few modest sentences ?? .. What did I wrote wrong. Please explain at least why you gave this negative rep point. This handeling breaks my heart and also my engagement and interest to share something. I deeply CONDEMN this behaviour !!
  18. Soaring thank you for your kind explanation on th usoc topic.

  19. Emre .. I spoke/wrote PM to with GB-Mod .. he said that the subforum will be added begin september. So lancing words like 'shame on you' .. it's not appropriate. We have to be patient for a few days to go. regards fatih
  20. Rols .. Normally I wanted to post this news item here. But I didn't had the time to translated it after I didn't/couldn't find a propriate already translated internet link/website about this. But I can give you the website where I found it: https://www.gsgm.gov.tr/Sayfalar/HaberDetaylari.aspx?HaberID=1842 It is the same text. The website is that of the 'Genaral Sports (and Youth) Directory' Normally I have a lot to share here from my archive. But I Pm'd GB-Mod about the istanbul2020 subforum. He said to wait till september the 1rst. After he creates the new subforum I will make a clean start to share systematically everything about the new bid. I've been doing a lot of researches about the intention where to build new venues & planned cluster plans. I'm preparing a lot and will begin with a general topic with the name " Istanbul 2020 - Bicontinental Games Diary ". This thread will continue news + agenda of what I will plan to share and it will serve like an index. I have the intention to be more active then in the last 6 years together here on GB. I will stand openly to all critics and question in the frame of my competence to answer those. But I believe that all the news nowadays are citates of foreign people/IF members who are in Turkey/istanbul in the frame of an international sports organisation (as above it was about an international pentathlon championship). The journalists in Turkey are asking more into the directon of getting wished answers back to feed the press-written-media. Because Turkey delivers accurate and clean organisations in the last couple of years. And with this wind in the back IF-members who are in the country are having good feedback about the organsation. But for me this article what you published here is not so important. He says for example (the interviewed person) That Turkey must use her own brain-power to produce a bid and mustn't work with foreign professionals. I'm against such an explanation. Why not using a mix of those two. After september 1rst I expecting profesional progammes with professional sportsmen who will informate on TV the Turkish audience with a more fresh view to it. I think that the new bid-procedure in the Turkish media will be reflected as 'a first bidding' than to speak about the 4 previous consecutive biddings. For now fatih
  21. Thank you for your explanation on the olympic stadium issue at the Usoc topic.

  22. To get an idea of the whirling dervishes.. this item is becoming a cliche, BUT you can create a lot of innovative ideas of how to bring those white whirls into the stadium. This is a part of the cultural programme at the opening cereminy of the 25th Winter Universiade Erzurum 2011. Just for u Rols .. your Turkish delight for 4 minutes ..
×
×
  • Create New...