Jump to content

Quaker2001

Members
  • Content Count

    7045
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    159

Everything posted by Quaker2001

  1. Might be? So you think the United States will boycott on "might be"? What specific behavior are we not tolerating that we would refuse to send an Olympics team to China? Particularly after we sent one there in 2008. You didn't answer the question. What would the purpose of a boycott that you think the United States and other Western nations might accomplish? We'll never know how history might have changed if the United States really knew what was going on in Germany in the mid-1930s and didn't send a team to Berlin. But this isn't 1936. It's 2020. The notion of a 1936 boycott had a fairly specific agenda. So did 1980. What's the agenda here? Again, with Trump as president, I can already see the narrative forming. Not with Biden. To say he's anti-China is not cause for him to organize and support a boycott.
  2. One has absolutely nothing to do with the other, so it's terrible logic to try and conflate the 2. What does history tell us about the 1980 boycott? That in hindsight, it was a dumb decision. It was a virtually pointless gesture in terms of affecting global politics. And the only thing that changed was that a large group of athletes forever lost their Olympic dreams. They were the ones who were hurt more than the Soviets. So what exactly is the hope that a 2022 boycott would accomplishment? Do we really think China will change because a handful of prominent Western nations didn't show up in Beijing? Is this retribution for the virus? If you think Biden would make a political statement (forget Trump.. we know any statement he makes will be solely about him and his ego), what would that statement be? It can't just be "grrr, we're angry at China, let's piss them off by boycotting their Olympics." That's an empty gesture that, much like Carter in 1980, will be remembered as a pointless political move that served absolutely no means
  3. There is no comparison between Biden and Trump on this one. None. To repeat what I said above.. if Trump wins, he will push for a boycott, not because he is anti-China, but to fuel his own ego and to rile up his base. And for no other reason. No amount of advice is likely to do much on that front. Different with Biden. He knows that a boycott isn't likely to accomplish anything, so it's not a matter of advisors talking him out of it. Someone would have to talk him into it in the first place. And while Trump can't still be president in 2028 (unless he were to lose and run again), if Biden wins, members of his team could still be there in 2028. So they'll knew what the ramifications are of boycotting 2022 with regards to 2028. It'll serve little purpose, especially without a lot of backing from other countries as we saw with the 1980 boycott.
  4. How so? You're talking 8 years from now, so we don't know what US-China relations will look like by that point. Who or what gets served by having China skip out on the 2028 Olympics, particularly if it's in retribution to any political agenda that might have been laid out years earlier?
  5. No. Don't consider that. In fact, erase that thought from your head immediately. That's a boycott any way you want to spin it. A lot of athletes get only 1 shot at an Olympics. No one is going to sit it out just because they feel bad for other athletes. That's not solidarity. That's stupidity. If athletes are fearful of travelling to China or supporting that country in any way, that's understandable. But I can promise you, there won't be a single athlete that says "I feel sorry for the wrestler who didn't get his moment.. I'm giving up my chance as well!"
  6. I'll believe it when I see it. Does the United States really want to boycott 2022 knowing it all but guarantees that China won't be here in 2028. And we know how big of a deal that was for them to show up in LA in 1984. If Trump gets re-elected (G-d help us if that happens), I'm sure he'll push for a 2022 boycott because someone will plant the idea in his head and he'll rile up all his supporters, and they'll force the USOPC's hand to cave in. If Biden wins the election?.. not sure sure he'll push so hard to make that kind of political statement, especially without a groundswell of other politicians pushing him for it. And I don't think that's going to happen. Should there be a more coordinating worldwide effort involved here, that's a different story. But again, how does the United States or France or Italy become a part of that when they're in bed with the IOC and did so after they had already awarded an Olympics to China? Because then that torpedoes the value of their investment and I'm not sure that's a route they'll want to be forced into. Let alone LA 2028 who is NOT backed by the government and relies on private funding. So that hurts them big time if a country representing 1/5 of humanity (as they reminded us with their 2008 pitch) isn't in attendance, and who knows what other countries might join them in solidarity.
  7. No one will say that last part. Stefan hit on it perfect.. China will maintain (as best they can) a happy face for the rest of the world knowing a lot of eyes will be on them for the next year and a half, as if there's already not a ton of scrutiny because of COVID-19. They won't do anything before February 2022 or else other countries will reject them and that's not what they want to project to the rest of the world. After that, then all bets are off
  8. Why would athletes not feel safe in China? Yea, the pandemic isn't over. That makes just about every country out there unsafe at this point. I don't see why China is somehow a scary place to be simply because that's where the virus originated from. The 1 thing 1 know we can count on from them is that they'll sanitize their world image and clean things up when everyone is focusing their attention on them. Yes, all of this is dependent on the situation with the virus being better in 2022 than it is now. Of course, there's another Olympics before then. Does Japan not need to worry about Covid?
  9. Who cares about fair? This is the IOC we're talking about. I'll believe in boycotts when I see them. You really think the USOPC would boycott an Olympics in China knowing it's almost certain that China would decline to come here in 2028? No shot. And should Tokyo not be able to host next Summer because of the pandemic, do you really think the IOC would punish themselves and tell China they're a no go? Right now is a pretty bad time for Olympism. Let's hope the state of the world, both in terms of the pandemic and other human rights issues, gets better in the next 12 months. I'm hopeful the virus can be reigned in to the point it's safe to have sports again (I plan on doing my part for that on November 3rd), but considering it was no secret that China did not in fact clean up their act after the 2008 Olympics, clearly the IOC does not consider human rights issues a dealbreaker.
  10. That's not how this works. The IOC is about to cut off their nose to spite their face. If the pandemic continues and it's not safe to hold the 2022 Olympics, that's one thing. But if Tokyo can't go, there's no shot the IOC is going to turn to China and say "you screwed things up for everyone.. no Olympics for you either, we're shutting it down" That would make absolutely no sense. Japan is struggling enough to try and put on the Tokyo Olympics. The last thing they need is to have another Olympics just a few months later. As is, I still wonder about their enthusiasm to bid for 2030 given what it's costing them to put on the 202One Olympics
  11. Who is ruling it out and thinks it won't happen? We have no idea what the world will look like 4 or 8 or 12 months from now. It doesn't need to be said, not by Dick Pound or whoever in a forum, that the Olympics might get cancelled. I think we all know that at this point. However, if they don't get cancelled...Tokyo Olympic schedule remains the same, venues lined up
  12. I don't care you're replying to an old comment, but it's missing the point completely to lose the point of reference when that comment is made. Yes, Sapporo said they're interested in bidding. That was before the 2020 Olympics got postponed by a year and will cost Japan a huge sum of money. And it's far from a guarantee that next summer will go off so smoothly. So add all that up together and are we confident Sapporo is going to bid for the 2030 Olympics? Because now it's going to be a year later that they are done with Tokyo and a lot more money spent, so they may have reservations about spending billions more on another Olympics when a lot of Japanese citizens aren't so sure they want the first one to happen.
  13. You're replying to a post from September. A couple of things have happened with the world since then that perhaps might affect whether or not Sapporo is in the game for 2030.
  14. The 1994 World Cup still holds the record for highest attendance, and that was with only 24 teams before they expanded. So clearly it wasn't that horrendous. Yes, I know the stories about European fans used to travelling by train who found it a little tougher to get around. Did Brazil not have to deal with that? Russia? And I'm pretty sure fans will welcome the North American experience with open arms after dealing with a World Cup held in Qatar. So save the sanctimonious nonsense as if the US-Canada-Mexico bid wasn't an obvious choice for 2026 over Morocco. It'll be an outstanding World Cup. And remember with expansion comes the new group stage format. 1/3 of all the teams will only play 2 games, so travel is not likely to be a major concern.
  15. This is FIFA we're talking about. Who once chose Qatar over the United States. So yes, it wasn't 100% that Australia/New Zealand would win, even against a less interesting bid
  16. You were saying... Australia & New Zealand Win Vote To Host 2023 FIFA Women’s World Cup
  17. Yea, we're pretty close to that point already. The good thing about 2028 is that - unless something ridiculous happens, and I don't even want to think about that - is that there's no way Trump is the President at that point and someone else will have been in place for at least 3.5 years. I can't offer an outsider's perspective, but I'm guessing we haven't quite reached the "we're as bad as China" point just yet.
  18. Qatar was awarded the 2022 World Cup nearly 10 years ago (December 2010). FIFA has had almost a decade to re-evaluate that choice with all that we've learned in that time. And yet the 2022 World Cup is still scheduled for Qatar. They didn't have the balls to go up against an oil rich Arab nation and tell them "you know what, we changed our minds.. sorry." If they didn't do that in 2013 or 2015 or 2017, why would they do it in 2020? Yes, that World Cup is likely going to be a disaster on a number of levels. But the time to fix that mistake has come and passed. FIFA has to live with the fallout and yes, they'll tell the world that they're happy with the decision rather than giving any indication they regret their choice.
  19. I've said it many times on here.. a lot of infrastructure projects got spurred on by the 2012 bid that might not have happened otherwise. So there was some value in that effort and what it led to, even though it didn't result in the Olympics coming here
  20. What is a "world class aquatic centre" anyway? Having an Olympic-sized pool and ancillary facilities is something many cities can build, but there's very little use to put thousands of seats in that venue considering how little that would get used. But it's interesting to note this is a thing... Flushing Meadows Natatorium That was going to be the water polo venue for the New York's 2012 Olympic bid. It got built anyway and opened in 2008.
  21. What Stefan said. The IOC isn't always the most forward-thinking organization. Sure, they may votes along lines with the next Olympics in mind, but do you really trust that the IOC will take care of Tokyo solely so they can ensure Sapporo would stay in the running for 2030? This postponement and the ensuing fallout may have but the kibosh on their plans already. The more alarming revelations from this are the implications on future hosts. Potential bidders may need to be increasingly wary of what they're getting themselves into. And yes, the IOC clearly needs be much more open with how they're helping out with Tokyo or else it's going to make them look bad.
  22. As the article notes.. there wasn't a plan B the first time out. Then they said they would take 4 weeks to come up with a plan B. 1 week later, they announced the postponement. I don't know if another postponement is possible and will be under consideration at any point. But it doesn't seem like it should be completely out of the realm of possible for that to happen just because he's saying so now
  23. Did you take your meds this morning?
×
×
  • Create New...