Jump to content

lucas_leobas

Members
  • Content Count

    259
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

6 Neutral

About lucas_leobas

  • Rank
    Silver

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Sao Paulo, Brazil
  1. Going to Buenos Aires! And I can't find my camera's charger!!!

  2. Good question. There is a little stain in the Brazilian football national team that the only championship we have not won yet is the Olympic championship. We were silver medalists in 84 and 88 and bronze in 96 and 08, but never gold. So probably that one. I would love to see Brazil winning some medals in athletics and gymnastics. But my favourite sport (along with football) is volleyball, so I'd like to see us sweeping both Men's and Women's competitions. ABout Beach volleyball, well, I hope May and Walsh are dead by then They're so above the rest of the competition that, even if they're 45 by then, I'm pretty sure they'll get the gold. If you had asked the least wanted medal, I say, enough of the sailing ones. It's an elitist sport and no one cares.
  3. I can almost listen to what Juvenal Juvêncio (SPFC 130-year-old president)'s mind when he learnt that FIFA wanted good visibility in the lower tier so that FIFA could charge more for the tickets: "Ok, let's extend part of the tier so they can actually see the game and pay some extra. The rest of the stadium will still be crap though, no problem about that, right?". SPFC is determined to doing the minimum they possibly can and spend the lowest possible amount of money to get the opening game. Every private enterprenour wants that, so it doesn't come as a surprise. I just get staggered at how our state and municipal government doesn't give a damn.
  4. Here's what's going on in São Paulo: we're not getting a public stadium. Our state government has other priorities and we can't blame them. Right now the public opinion seems to support such decision, but I think we may have a considerable backlash when it's announced that there will be no opening game or semifinals in the city. FIFA and São Paulo Futebol Clube (SPFC - Morumbi Stadium's owner) were getting along pretty well in the last few months. FIFA made it pretty clear that Morumbi Stadium needed changes in order to host important games in the WC and SPFC were accepting them and making changes to the project. GMP was hired, there were significant changes in the exterior project and the roof, not to mention a new building to be used as a parking lot. All FIFA's demands were taken by SPFC, except for one: the stands. Currently, the stands are far away from the pitch, with visibility problems in the two lower tiers, specially the lower one. FIFA wants such problems to be corrected, which could be made through the extension of the middle tier until the pitch or lowering of the field and extension of the lower tier. SPFC doesn't want to make such changes: it would affect their contracts with the owners of stores in the internal part of the stadium and bring a lot of extra expenditure. Their last project was a gem - partial extension of the middle tier: As previously explained by aluz, it is very important to FIFA that the visibility in the lower tiers is the best possible, since they are the most expensive tickets sold in a WC game. Up until this month, our media reported that SPFC knew that their project was far from ideal but intended to do anything FIFA asks in order to secure the hosting of the opening game. Until Feburary 9th, when there was a reunion between representants of all host cities and FIFA. SPFC representants said that FIFA gave them thumbs up with the project in their rendezvous. Jerome Valcke from FIFA read the news and was like "WTH?". He said São Paulo's project is only enough for games up to the Round of 16. Apparently there was a huge misunderstanding between them. Now both parties are in a he-said, she-said that will probably last at least one more week.
  5. First of all, Sir Roltel seemed to have REALLY liked Watermelon Woman and all the rest of the fruit women. I love how we are getting bizarre versions of it: I just googled Mulher-Xtudão and wow! Great translation, Danny, by the way. Big Mac Woman sounds awesome . But I have bad news: Fruit women is very 2008 right now. Créu had a little revival in October with the whole "Yes we créu" fad, but now it's pretty much gone. "Watermelon Woman", however, is an expression that has gone into our pop culture and I'm pretty sure it'll be remembered for a whole generation, just like "Bootylicious" in America. I haven't been to the beach this summer to capture what are our lattest summer fads. Not that we need to be in the summer to go to the beach But I'll tell you guys as soon as I do it.
  6. I thought we were talking about the facts, not at an ideal level. My bad. Do you honestly believe that?
  7. In Brazil, Goiânia (my birth city - with two teams in the Série A) was overlooked because it was too close to Brasília. Cuiabá (no teams in Série A or got chosen because it's in our southwest, while Manaus (no teams in Série A or was choasen because it`s in the Amazon. I think Nelspruit in South Africa also got chosen on geographical grounds. Geography plays a huge part in the choice of the cities.
  8. Everyone just loves a conspiratory plot. But, no, Catra, there is absolutely no evidence that Jerome Valcke may be advantaged in any way from the construction of a new stadium in São Paulo, Manaus or wherever. And saying that Mastercard questioned his fairplay does little to prove the opposite. He's just making sure that Brazil abide by the rules it accepted when chosen hosts of the World Cup. He's not making any absurd demands, or demands that aren't contained in FIFA's guidelines. I'm not going to discuss the rest of the post because this forum is not the place to discuss the concept of social justice.
  9. Funny thing how outraged how some of you guys get once Jim Jones starts speaking about the developed countries, and then you start trying to belittle India in this thread. I've never got through one of his posts because he doesn't use commas, but I bet most of the facts stated by him are actually true. So it's not a matter of accuracy, but rather the way information is told. And I've seen a lot of disrespect towards India in the previous pages, by A LOT of people. I know 90% of the posts are just expressions of concern towards India's preparations to the CWG, but the other 10% can be really offensive to those that are out of the American-British-Australian-Mo click that seems to rule this forum and decide what's offensive and what's not.
  10. Are baba, the stereotype is right!!! (sorry, this is an in-joke for telenovela-watching Brazilians - I know, ANOTHER stereotype )
  11. wow, I didn't know Santiago had given up the organization of pretty much ALL multi-sports events they were awarded.
  12. The could always go with a lion. Whatever the mascot may be, I hope it's as hiperactive as Berlino. London doesn't have many expectatios to live up to since Beijing's pokemons and Athens' children with elephanthiasis weren't exactly examples of great mascots.
  13. If we consider strictly the stadium aspect, I would say that Curitiba's situation is one of the most worrying. The project presented to FIFA would cost R$138 million. Now that they have been chosen as hosts, Atlético Parananse say that they will spend only R$38 million unless another private partner steps in or the government helps (which will obviously not happen). All in all, this isn't such a huge problem, since Curitiba will probably only receive first-phase games, and the stadium could be used as it is right now. So, this will not really happen: But of course Curitiba is a great city and deserves praises for the other aspects, specially transportation. Also, aluz, most bureaucracy problems such as project approval and necessary permits are already underway to most new stadiums. That is usually what takes up most time in Brazilian construction works. The lapse of time between the awarding of the procurement to one of the bidding companies and the beginning of the construction is usually not longer than 6 months. Today, good news: Cuiabá will hold the licitation to the construction of the Verdão stadium on November 25th - this will be a normal concession, not a PPP. Like I said, those cities that are not delusional about finding private partners will get things done faster.
  14. This whole discussion about the Morumbi stadium is eclipsing all the other debates about the World Cup, but we have many other problems going on. I'm pretty sure at this point the Brasília will have the opening match and São Paulo will host until quarterfinals with a refurbished Morumbi. And, even if Brasília can't do it, we still have Maracanã. This is the least of our problems. The real problem is that the works have to start until March, and no public stadium has even published the calling announcement to the procurement/public-private partnerships (actually I think Salvador is the only one that has already done that). Even Rio de Janeiro, with the most potentially attractive stadium in Brazil has been considering to not look for private investors and get financing directly from BNDES, since they think no-one may be interested. But how could they expect anything different? Maracanã, as of today, profits R$3 million a year, for example. And the interested company would have to spend R$450 million with the reform, and then be granted a 35-year concession of the stadium. So, basically, they would have to quadruple the profits to BREAK EVEN. OF COURSE no one will be interested. I don't think it's feasible to believe that all stadiums will start to be built until March. Actually, right now, I believe that the only ones that will do are those that have assumed no money would come from private partners (Cuiabá, Manaus, Natal and BH). The other ones (Brasília, Rio(?), Salvador, Recife and Fortaleza) will still take some months to get around the idea that, well, no one will be interested.
  15. 1 - The current SPFC project is already too expensive: a R$250-million renovation to a stadium that only generates an annual profit of R$11 million is already overambitious. But what they are putting on the table is still not enough. The capacity is low and SPFC doesn't want to lower the stands in order to get them closer to the pitch. Not the mention the problems in the surroundings, that were only partially resolved in the last project amendment. There have been reports of people within the São Paulo committee supporting that the city gives up on hosting the opening match, because of not only the problems with the stadium: Which is a huge concern considering these will probably be the people in our presidency from 2011 to 2014.
×
×
  • Create New...