PrayodiB738

Damn it grows on me already. And i can just foresee how the look of the games, simple, very swiss-international style, munich 72 style something like that I love the experimentation of the shape, especially when it comes to motion, what's the term of it, "Gestalt" style?

yea, i agree. To me, pure from design aspect, based from the principle and the system, it is just plain bad. But the more i look of it, the more of i find the uniqueness of it, it is something different allright. And i do too think the 2012 logo to be good, especially when i see explainantion from the guys at Wally Ollins and the amazing variation and implemantion of it. Let just wait and see. ---------- Anyway, they create competition for this right?

Every logo must have negative-postive space system to overcome its implemantion on every possible media And this logo comes very difficult, not only it becomes "something new"-creating a whole new visual meaning, Outline must be added to its overlapping shapes in paralympic logo This is an example of a bad logo.

To me, it is underwhelming -------- In term of design, it somehow takes note from the work of Ikko tanaka, Japan prolific designer from the 1970-1980, just like this: and like what one forumer above said, "like 1970 wallpaper", because the design style used in the logo is "international style" famous in 1970-1980. ------ What i really hate about this logo design is that, it tries to take notes from history, but it is so dependance on it, that the result is so last-decade. Adding to that, it lost the obligatory design principle to make this logo good, like harmony, rhythm, and to the iro

To me, it is underwhelming In term of design, it somehow takes note from the work of Ikko tanaka, Japan prolific designer from the 1970-1980, just like this: and like what one forumer above said, "like 1970 wallpaper", because the design style used in the logo is "international style" famous in 1970-1980. ---- What i really hate about this logo design is that, it tries to take notes from history, but it is so dependance on it, that the result is so last-decade. Adding to that, it lost the obligatory design principle to make this logo good, like harmony, rhythm, and to the irony, unity.