Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 10/14/2025 in all areas

  1. No, it was a low risk bidder. It had many existing venues, got enough government support and Junior Pan Am Games experience. The Pan Am Games village, a new athletic stadium and a new arena need to be built. Rio's was a high risk cuz it didn't get enough government support, hotel problems and many new venues would've been built and some existing venues would've been used if Rio-Niteroi would've won. That's why Asuncion (which i was infavor of) won over Rio by 4 vote 28-24 (Same as 2027 bid which they lost to Lima).
    1 point
  2. So rols, u were wrong about Asuncion not hosting it. So they will in 2031 after a strong bid
    0 points
×
×
  • Create New...