GBModerator Posted July 7, 2014 Report Share Posted July 7, 2014 GamesBids.com is reporting from the scene at the IOC Executive Board meetings in Lausanne, Switzerland View the full article Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Team USA Posted July 7, 2014 Report Share Posted July 7, 2014 Not very exciting we know what's coming Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob2012 Posted July 7, 2014 Report Share Posted July 7, 2014 What will be more interesting will be any accompanying statements and the tone they strike. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
runningrings Posted July 7, 2014 Report Share Posted July 7, 2014 Almaty looks good to me! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StefanMUC Posted July 7, 2014 Report Share Posted July 7, 2014 In between the WC threads and Personal Insults Games (PIG), I had almost forgotten there's proper Olympics news today finally. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
p85 Posted July 7, 2014 Report Share Posted July 7, 2014 All three cities were shortlisted. The report http://www.olympic.org/Documents/Host_city_elections/2022_Working_Group_Report.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Olympic Fan Darcy Posted July 7, 2014 Report Share Posted July 7, 2014 Can someone explain this? Cause if Almaty has worse air quality then Beijing then my whole argument against Beijing is out the window. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Olympic Fan Darcy Posted July 7, 2014 Report Share Posted July 7, 2014 Just quickly did this. Sorry it's a bit crap. The IOC have a benchmark of a 6 so anything below a 6 is in red. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
p85 Posted July 7, 2014 Report Share Posted July 7, 2014 Did the IOC stopped using "Weights"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thatsnotmypuppy Posted July 7, 2014 Report Share Posted July 7, 2014 Almaty is definitely right on the cusp of being eliminated - however a two horse race (which may still happen) would be somewhat embarrassing to the IOC.. Wow - 5.0 for transport for Beijing? That is the one area it should get a big score. The subway goes everywhere now and the Chinese will build multi-track high speed train line if needed to the ski fields. The one thing I would not be worried about is the transport plan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Olympic Fan Darcy Posted July 7, 2014 Report Share Posted July 7, 2014 Did the IOC stopped using "Weights"? Well that makes my crappy attempt look awful. But at least I didn't have olympic village twice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GBModerator Posted July 7, 2014 Author Report Share Posted July 7, 2014 Did the IOC stopped using "Weights"? Yes, they did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quaker2001 Posted July 7, 2014 Report Share Posted July 7, 2014 Well gee, who would have guessed that Almaty would be so underwhelming. Whether or not the IOC voting members actually take any of this information into consideration, clearly there's a weakest bid of the 3. Someone needs to remind the Oslo folks this remains theirs to lose if they can just hold on for dear life and make it to the vote (which, after seeing these numbers, IMO seems just a little more likely at this point) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
runningrings Posted July 7, 2014 Report Share Posted July 7, 2014 Didn't work for Bavarian voters- who poured cold water on Munich 2022 which would have been as obvious a choice as Los Angeles 1984. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quaker2001 Posted July 7, 2014 Report Share Posted July 7, 2014 Didn't work for Bavarian voters- who poured cold water on Munich 2022 which would have been as obvious a choice as Los Angeles 1984. True, but they also dropped out much earlier in the running. That Oslo has lasted this much longer means they're that much closer to the finish line. And you also have the DOSB which would also consider a summer bid. Not a consideration for Norway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
p85 Posted July 7, 2014 Report Share Posted July 7, 2014 "It represents the unanimous opinion of all members of the 2022 Working Group as agreed on 9 May 2014" Any chance we'll see the scores for Krakow and Lviv bids, since they were both prepared before Krakow referendum fiasco and Lviv withdrawal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FYI Posted July 7, 2014 Report Share Posted July 7, 2014 Well gee, who would have guessed that Almaty would be so underwhelming. Whether or not the IOC voting members actually take any of this information into consideration, clearly there's a weakest bid of the 3. Almaty is definitely right on the cusp of being eliminated - however a two horse race (which may still happen) would be somewhat embarrassing to the IOC. And yet I was always chastised by the Almaty cheerleading squad when trying to point that out. Yet here we have the IOC's own working group showing how lacking they really are. And this also just further illustrates that the short-list is seemingly not just about 'technical scores'. Cause had we had a packed quality field for 2022, like initially expected, with the likes of Munich, Stockholm, St. Moritz, Krakow & perhaps another good surprise bid or two, Almaty would've been done for. Perhaps a two-horse race could've been embarrassing for the IOC. But then again, still including a bid that's so far away from the other two I don't believe does them any favors either. I mean really, had Lviv not finally (sensibly) withdrawn last week, would the IOC EB included them too, in order not have an 'embarrassing race'. Oslo (& Norway), these are absolutely your Winter Games, if you want them. You also don't have to over-indulge in this case. You have the upper hand here in this game of Olympic chess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FYI Posted July 7, 2014 Report Share Posted July 7, 2014 Any chance we'll see the scores for Krakow and Lviv bids, since they were both prepared before Krakow referendum fiasco and Lviv withdrawal? Yeah, that would be interesting, wouldn't it. To see how close their numbers were in comparison to Almaty. So in that sense, probably nil to none that we'll get to see those numbers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zekekelso Posted July 7, 2014 Report Share Posted July 7, 2014 Almaty is definitely right on the cusp of being eliminated - . Shocking! And I strongly suspect the numbers were goosed to justify them being shorlisted. Unless both Oslo and Beijing quit, the Olympics are not going to Kazakhstan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quaker2001 Posted July 7, 2014 Report Share Posted July 7, 2014 Shocking! And I strongly suspect the numbers were goosed to justify them being shorlisted. Unless both Oslo and Beijing quit, the Olympics are not going to Kazakhstan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ofan Posted July 7, 2014 Report Share Posted July 7, 2014 Those evaluation scores are so telling. The amount which Oslo dominates Almaty and Beijing technically is incredible. If only they could get those damn public support numbers up.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FYI Posted July 7, 2014 Report Share Posted July 7, 2014 Gold Coast Lion must've had something to do with those 'goosed' numbers. Ya know, Almaty being the 'new winter sports hub' & all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Coast Lions Posted July 7, 2014 Report Share Posted July 7, 2014 With the shocking support for Oslo Norway just 36% I don;t think the people of Norway will care less about the score they clearly don't want the games and an one governing party is against the the bid, All but 1 Youth divisions of Political Parties are against the bid this is an slow and painful death for Oslo 2022 bid, Norway people is not like Japan people were the government was pushing for the 2020 bid in Japan and Japanese are respectful of the governments policy unlike in Norway where is an private group pushing for the bid. Its way too soon for Norway to host again and they are hosting the 2016 Youth Winter Games leave it for another Generation or 2 then to host another Winter Games is the best way that an Norway winter Olympics Games happen again. So this race is between Almaty Kazakhstan and Beijing China for the 2022 Winter Olympics and Paralympics Games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StefanMUC Posted July 7, 2014 Report Share Posted July 7, 2014 Gold Coast Lion must've had something to do with those 'goosed' numbers. Ya know, Almaty being the 'new winter sports hub' & all. Speaking of... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony E Loves Architecture Posted July 7, 2014 Report Share Posted July 7, 2014 With the shocking support for Oslo Norway just 36% I don;t think the people of Norway will care less about the score they clearly don't want the games and an one governing party is against the the bid, All but 1 Youth divisions of Political Parties are against the bid this is an slow and painful death for Oslo 2022 bid, Norway people is not like Japan people were the government was pushing for the 2020 bid in Japan and Japanese are respectful of the governments policy unlike in Norway where is an private group pushing for the bid. Its way too soon for Norway to host again and they are hosting the 2016 Youth Winter Games leave it for another Generation or 2 then to host another Winter Games is the best way that an Norway winter Olympics Games happen again. So this race is between Almaty Kazakhstan and Beijing China for the 2022 Winter Olympics and Paralympics Games. Just like China Hosted 2008 and will Host 2014 Summer Youth Olympic Games and Kazakhstan Hosted the 2011 Asian Winter Games? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.