Jump to content


Will the bombing of Iran's Nuke Plant Jeopardize 2012?


17 replies to this topic

#11 cormiermax

    Flag Bearer

  • Premium Members
  • 1311 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Nova Scotia
  • Interests:Olympics, Cycling, Golfing

Posted 04 February 2012 - 03:51 AM

Israel try's it on there own there cities get obliterated by thousands of Iranian missiles, If the west takes action so will Russia and China and we all know what that means. Iran poses no real threat to anyone, even if they were developing nuclear weapons it's only in defence of there sovereignty which is rightly justified as they are constantly threatened with attack.

All in all this is a very dangerous situation that I hope all party's will back down from, because any war in Iran could and most likely will get out of hand extremely fast and could spark the third world war.

View Postbaron-pierreIV, on 03 February 2012 - 11:11 PM, said:

Tikus, it's only a 3rd possibility that Israel may resort to if the sanctions don't work and Israel feels it becomes too late to stop Iran's plans. But you know, Israel nuked Syria and Iraq before, and nothing but demonstrations happened. If only someone assassinated those moronic mullahs in Tehran.

Since when has Israel used nuclear weapons? I'm pretty sure they used conventional weapons on there respective targets in Iraq and Syria.

#12 emre

    IOC president

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1282 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Irresistanbul

Posted 04 February 2012 - 03:52 AM

one point u all missed is İsrael has nukes, so why cannot other s have as a defence?? or why other nations force ısrael to bann nucleur tech and get rid of the nukes?

turkey doesnt need any, but if we develope and have nukes with our selfes who can stop us and why?
if really they want a clear world so why not they start w,ith usa russia ???

unbalance and not fair. they can have anything and can use dem but the other nooo...1000 nukes usa have . thats a bigger problem than iran i think
The Persian name was Dersaadet—Door to the Ultimate Happiness. The Greeks called it Teofilaktos—City Guarded by God; the Romans, Nuova Roma—New Rome; the Arabs, Farrouk—City Separating Two Continents; and the Ottoman Turks, Ummti-diinya—Mother of the World. Now, and since 1923 when the Turkish Republic formally renamed it, it is called Istanbul, meaning just The City—as though there were none other to compare.

#13 cormiermax

    Flag Bearer

  • Premium Members
  • 1311 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Nova Scotia
  • Interests:Olympics, Cycling, Golfing

Posted 04 February 2012 - 03:57 AM

View Postemre, on 04 February 2012 - 03:52 AM, said:

one point u all missed is İsrael has nukes, so why cannot other s have as a defence?? or why other nations force ısrael to bann nucleur tech and get rid of the nukes?

turkey doesnt need any, but if we develope and have nukes with our selfes who can stop us and why?
if really they want a clear world so why not they start w,ith usa russia ???

unbalance and not fair. they can have anything and can use dem but the other nooo...1000 nukes usa have . thats a bigger problem than iran i think

The answer is simple, the only reason Israel is so strongly against a nuclear Iran is they will no longer be the only middle eastern power with nuclear weapons, there for it would create two simi-equal powers in the region in a way like a mini cold war. If anything a nuclear armed Iran will help stabilize the region.

#14 emre

    IOC president

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1282 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Irresistanbul

Posted 04 February 2012 - 04:21 AM

so turkey saudi arabia or even qtar can have nukes, but iran no. cause west and israel doesnt like dem? this is the problem?
The Persian name was Dersaadet—Door to the Ultimate Happiness. The Greeks called it Teofilaktos—City Guarded by God; the Romans, Nuova Roma—New Rome; the Arabs, Farrouk—City Separating Two Continents; and the Ottoman Turks, Ummti-diinya—Mother of the World. Now, and since 1923 when the Turkish Republic formally renamed it, it is called Istanbul, meaning just The City—as though there were none other to compare.

#15 cormiermax

    Flag Bearer

  • Premium Members
  • 1311 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Nova Scotia
  • Interests:Olympics, Cycling, Golfing

Posted 04 February 2012 - 04:32 AM

View Postemre, on 04 February 2012 - 04:21 AM, said:

so turkey saudi arabia or even qtar can have nukes, but iran no. cause west and israel doesnt like dem? this is the problem?

All those country's you listed would be in the same boat Iran is in now if they were pursuing a nuclear weapons program.

#16 emre

    IOC president

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1282 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Irresistanbul

Posted 04 February 2012 - 04:42 AM

View Postcormiermax, on 04 February 2012 - 04:32 AM, said:

All those country's you listed would be in the same boat Iran is in now if they were pursuing a nuclear weapons program.

so the main issue is to secure israel ...

USA and west can say this, at least they named as honest, and legalize everything israel did and will do after that.

sorry but im not a religious person i dont care about irans threats or israels and no harm i saw from dem or wanna harm dem too. im a turk and i will support what ever my country needs as defence. and non of the countries or u can change my mind while others still developing nukes balistics and chemical weapons.

if its that BAD and will bring the end of the world so dismiss your beautiful nukes in yourlands and den tell others. its not convincing

im against another invasion in my backdoor. enough blood spilled in this region for 20 years and its now to talk and understand each other wat we need what we ask and whats the problem. and meet in the middle to live in peace.
The Persian name was Dersaadet—Door to the Ultimate Happiness. The Greeks called it Teofilaktos—City Guarded by God; the Romans, Nuova Roma—New Rome; the Arabs, Farrouk—City Separating Two Continents; and the Ottoman Turks, Ummti-diinya—Mother of the World. Now, and since 1923 when the Turkish Republic formally renamed it, it is called Istanbul, meaning just The City—as though there were none other to compare.

#17 oakydoky

    Flag Bearer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1789 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Scotland

Posted 04 February 2012 - 12:00 PM

God bless Israel.
Posted Image

#18 Texas

    Gold

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 628 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 15 February 2012 - 12:03 AM

I don't see war happening. I would think that the Europeans would need to solve their financial issues first before they even think about going into another war.
Posted Image





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users