krow, on 01 January 2012 - 11:22 PM, said:
are the tv rights in trinidad worth much more than $1?
i just don't see how this is a story. unless it can be proven that these inducements were conditional on his support for blatter,which is just going to come down to a case of he said/she said.
and if was a bribe (and let's be honest, it probably was), i think it was about as noble a bribe as humanly feasible. developing sport and infrastructure in a developing nation? not exactly a shockingly perverted use of fifa funding.
It is very hard to know what to believe, you're right. Warner's track record is hardly brilliant though. Ask the T&T World Cup squad or the black market ticket tout who was sold thousands of tickets, or Lord Triesmann what Warner is like with money and where his priorities are. If Warner was sold the rights for $1 then subsequently sold them on for more, his track record doesn't suggest all the funds would have gone to football development, quite the opposite in fact.
MrCatra, on 15 January 2012 - 04:22 AM, said:
reasonable price considering his costs for broadcasting the games in his home country. FIFA should always help smaller countries. Spreading football should be their target. No need to exploit a poor country.
Warner sold the rights on! The cost of the rights to T&T was
not $1, it was whatever Warner subsequently charged, which would have been market rate.
Baron's got it right. The implication here is Blatter gets some votes in his election bid, Warner gets TV rights on the cheap to sell on at a handsome profit. Now Warner is of course claiming that profit was used to develop the Game in the Caribbean, but given his track record I wonder, I really do.