Why Does Rio Insist On Two Stadiums?
#1
Posted 03 October 2009 - 06:10 PM
SAN FRANCISCO 2024
#2
Posted 03 October 2009 - 06:13 PM
#3
Posted 03 October 2009 - 06:16 PM
That's really crappy.
The IOC should make a requirement that Athletics and the Opening Ceremonies must be held in the same stadium. That way you either build a stadium that can accommodate both, or you don't bid.
SAN FRANCISCO 2024
#4
Posted 03 October 2009 - 06:25 PM
#5
Posted 03 October 2009 - 06:30 PM
OneTimeOnly, on Oct 4 2009, 12:16 AM, said:
That's really crappy.
The IOC should make a requirement that Athletics and the Opening Ceremonies must be held in the same stadium. That way you either build a stadium that can accommodate both, or you don't bid.
But why? The Winter Games use stadia ONLY for Ceremonies, so why should it be any different for the Summer?
"Secrets of the Olympic Ceremonies"
www.secretolympiceremony.com
Bigger, better, larger, sexier 2012 edition of the book NOW available. More secrets revealed.
Contains HOT pictures from Vancouver and Olympia. Available on Amazon.com, CreateSpace, and my website.
10% off via my website or www.createspace.com/3396522 using this discount code: 6Y79VJR7.
#6
Posted 03 October 2009 - 06:33 PM
OneTimeOnly, on Oct 4 2009, 01:16 AM, said:
That's really crappy.
The IOC should make a requirement that Athletics and the Opening Ceremonies must be held in the same stadium. That way you either build a stadium that can accommodate both, or you don't bid.
We have an athletics stadium approved by IAAF and we are not up to wasting money on having another one.
This requirement doesn't exist, then there will be 2 stadia.
#7
Posted 03 October 2009 - 06:34 PM
OneTimeOnly, on Oct 3 2009, 08:16 PM, said:
That's really crappy.
The IOC should make a requirement that Athletics and the Opening Ceremonies must be held in the same stadium. That way you either build a stadium that can accommodate both, or you don't bid.
Please explain the real problem of having the opening cerimonies in another stadium...
#8
Posted 03 October 2009 - 06:55 PM
baron-pierreIV, on Oct 3 2009, 07:30 PM, said:
The winter games are irrelevant, IMO, to the issue.
SAN FRANCISCO 2024
#9
Posted 03 October 2009 - 06:59 PM
Feheva, on Oct 3 2009, 07:34 PM, said:
Because it's garbage to do so. I really hate it. There should be only ONE Olympic Stadium, where the Opening and Closing Ceremonies will be held, and Athletics should be held there, as well, with the competitions taking place under the flame. I know I'm not the only one who feels this way. If a bid city in Europe, North America, or Asia proposed this, I doubt it would be well received. Brazil just doesn't have the money to build a new stadium, and I think Brazil was given a pass on this issue. No one else would have been, IMO.
SAN FRANCISCO 2024
#10
Posted 03 October 2009 - 07:06 PM
Personally I am absolutely not a fan of that since athletics is the main sport of the Olympic Games and the venue for track and field is a kind of home during the games...
GO BULGARIA!!!! GO SLOVAKIA!!!!
When you don't close your eyes, you will recognise that Love is unlimited
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users














