56 replies to this topic

[Stu]

Despite the fact India has an amazing economy - one of the world's fastest growing - and the second largest population in the world, both urban and rural poverty are at very high levels at the moment - I'm sure they will have infrastructure problems.  Having said that India is one of the most culturally wealthy nations on the planet, in 12 to 16 years I'm sure they will be a formidable opponent for other cities.  

India has also has to invest more in sport - they are one of the constant under achievers in the Olympics, however, many would have said the same about China a decade ago and I'm sure we will see a similar growth in India.

Good luck to Delhi!!

[NYCD 2012]

I don't think so ...... like I mean how many gold medals did India have in 2004

[Michael]

Guardian, on Dec. 04 2005,15:34, said:

The Kardiac Kid, on Dec. 04 2005,05:27, said:

India has a lot of coast. I'm sure they could find somewhere.
If they are going to bid, they need to get experianced people who've done this sort of thing for years in right now, and they need to start working right now. Otherwise they won't make it through the perliminaries.

If India had a coast site for Olympic sailing, which one would the IOA choose? Besides, would they choose a site closest to Delhi? I would assume so.

Perhaps, but Madrid had Majorca as it's location for the sailing if they'd won, so they might just choose the location with the best facilities , even if it were in that bit near Myanmar.

[IceNarcissus]

Don't forget about India's ongoing conflicts with Pakistan, China, groups in Kashmir and Tamil Nadu, etc.

If they can be put aside for the Commonwealth Games then I'm sure an OGs is possible, but the election for 2016 is before the 2010 CWGs, so that may not prove India being able to host a complete and successful event.

[baron-pierreIV]

Actually, neither city would do.  It's New Delhi that the IOA is promoting as their best bet, not another city.

[NYCD 2012]

Stu, on Dec. 06 2005,09:03, said:

It's NEW Mumbai!!!! :laugh:

You mean Navi Mumbai ?

[baron-pierreIV]

I don't even know why I'm bringing this thread back up -- but I guess I am just reacting to the GB news story about our President 'promoting' New Delhi's 2016 Olympic dreams??  GBMod, where did you pick this story up?

I mean -talk about putting a 'spin' on things.    WHy would the US president get involved in another country's Olympic decisions when his own country harbors its own ambitions in the same time frame?  I mean unless Pakistan planted that story, it's really one of the most absurd I've heard.  I'd even believe that Mahatma Gandhi endorses a 2016 bid by India rather than this poppycock story.

[Kenadian]

I believe that India is, at best, about 30-40 years off from a successful bid.  The country has the population and it is a growing economy, but it has two major things going against it...a weak infrastructure and a poor sporting tradition.

One bronze in Atlanta.  Another in Sydney.  And a silver in Athens.

[HFB-Melbourne]

Mo Rush, on Mar. 05 2006,17:08, said:

by 2009 cape town would have completed its 70,000 stadium, to host athletic, football and other events etc.
along with a central park like surroundings and possibly an indoor arena, with fairly good transport facilities in and around the area, certainly not to host the olympic games but suitable for the world cup...a 2016 bid from cape town..how much better do you think its chances are now, i.e. presenting a bid with an existing recently built all weather stadium, along with park like surroundings...

or do the delhi 2010 games really boost delhi's chances by that much more...what does the IOC think? football world cup or commonwealth games..?? which gains more credibility even if the one is  national and the other a city based event.

Actually, I believe the Commonwealth Games are a better indicator of a candidate cities abilities then the World Cup.

The world cup is obviously a much grander event, but the Commonwealth Games really do stretch a city and make it 'work' more completely then a world cup.

India will probably be waiting until the 2030s or so. But if New Delhi 2010 is a success, that could move up to 2024-2028.

[alexaus]

After watching the small segment promoting India 2010 at the closing ceremony in Melbourne last night, I think it would be a magic choice.  I think it is almost imperative that the worlds fastest growing nation takes up as a host of the Olympic games.  2016 may be out of the question as it would have to be a succesful candidate at the 2009 session before the commonwealth games have taken place.  So a genuine bid would be 2020.  It would really be something special.  Bollywood meets the IOC - would be very colorful.

Go delhi go!!!