daveypodmore, on Jun 15 2008, 07:22 PM, said:
Its not a complete mess for a start, thats my opinion. You also say proffessional designers hate it. Im a designer & I dont. What has amazed me this year considering how many people allegedly hate it, just how many times that brand has been used as something of merit both by us as designers and by our clients as something that they wish to achieve when re-branding.
Having said all that its just my opinion, this is a thread about the mascot so I wont go on about it anymore.
so davey in your pro opinion how does one possibly tie a mascot to that Thing they call a logo? To me it is very much impossible unless you rip off sponge bob Square Pants
in the shape of the design of one of the elements dimensionalized and had arms legs and a face added. I cannot understand why anyone would want to possibly go in that direction rebranding their company . Too me it spells chaos or something not to be taken seriously . There is really nothing redeeming about that logo from and artistic or practical communication level that translates to confidence in the olympic brand. Adn the excuse it is trying to appeal to youth is bogus. things that are x factor or youth culture do not look like that in any shape or forum .
I don't know it is quite a problem to link a mascot to that image and type of clear path. They might make these games the recycling games well see if Star Trek would lease them the Horta from the Devil in the Dark episodes from the 1960s .

Jim jones